Development of risk prediction nomogram for neonatal sepsis in Group B Streptococcus-colonized mothers: a retrospective study

Mengqi Wu,Yanbing Deng,Xinye Wang,Baomei He,Fangqiang Wei,Ying Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55783-2
IF: 4.6
2024-03-09
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Neonatal clinical sepsis is recognized as a significant health problem, This study sought to identify a predictive model of risk factors for clinical neonatal sepsis. A retrospective study was conducted from 1 October 2018 to 31 March 2023 in a large tertiary hospital in China. Neonates were divided into patients and controls based on the occurrence of neonatal sepsis. A multivariable model was used to determine risk factors and construct models.The utilization and assessment of model presentation were conducted using Norman charts and web calculators, with a focus on model differentiation, calibration, and clinical applicability (DCA). Furthermore, the hospital's data from 1 April 2023 to 1 January 2024 was utilized for internal validation. In the modelling dataset, a total of 339 pairs of mothers and their newborns were included in the study and divided into two groups: patients (n = 84, 24.78%) and controls (n = 255, 75.22%). Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between various factors and outcome. The results showed that maternal age < 26 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–4.42, p = 0.034), maternal gestational diabetes (OR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.11–4.27, p = 0.024), forceps assisted delivery (OR = 3.76, 95% CI 1.72–5.21, p = 0.032), umbilical cord winding (OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.32–2.67, p = 0.041) and male neonatal sex (OR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.00–2.62, p = 0.050) were identified as independent factors influencing the outcome of neonatal clinical sepsis. A main effects model was developed incorporating these five significant factors, resulting in an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.713 (95% CI 0.635–0.773) for predicting the occurrence of neonatal clinical sepsis. In the internal validation cohort, the AUC value of the model was 0.711, with a 95% CI of 0.592–0.808. A main effects model incorporating the five significant factors was constructed to help healthcare professionals make informed decisions and improve clinical outcomes.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?