A novel classification of posterior pelvic exenteration to assess prognosis in female patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study from China PelvEx collaborative

Yuegang Li,Meng Zhuang,Gang Hu,Jinzhu Zhang,Wenlong Qiu,Shiwen Mei,Jianqiang Tang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-024-04632-9
IF: 2.8
2024-04-27
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Abstract:Surgical techniques and the prognosis of posterior pelvic exenteration for locally advanced primary rectal cancer in female patients pose challenges that need to be addressed. Therefore, we investigated the short-term and survival outcomes of posterior pelvic exenteration in female patients using a novel Peking classification.
gastroenterology & hepatology,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the surgical techniques and prognostic challenges associated with Posterior Pelvic Exenteration (PPE) for female patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (LARC), particularly when the tumor invades internal reproductive organs. The study introduces a new classification system—the Peking Classification—to categorize PPE into four subtypes and conducts a retrospective cohort study based on this classification system. Specifically, the main objectives of the study include: - Investigating the short-term and long-term survival outcomes of different PPE subtypes; - Validating the effectiveness of the Peking Classification in guiding the choice of surgical methods and conducting prognostic assessments. The research team collected data from three tertiary referral centers of the China PelvEx Collaborative Group, analyzing the records of 172 female patients who underwent PPE. According to the Peking Classification, these patients were divided into four subtypes: PPE-I, PPE-II, PPE-III, and PPE-IV. The study results showed significant differences among the subtypes in terms of surgical reconstruction methods, in-hospital complications, and other aspects. Additionally, higher PPE classification types were associated with poorer Overall Survival (OS) and Disease-Free Survival (DFS). The study also found that the Peking Classification helps in determining appropriate surgical techniques and conducting prognostic assessments. In summary, this study aims to address the issues of selecting PPE surgical techniques and their impact on patient prognosis in the context of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.