Modified Posterior Pelvic Exenteration in Primary Cytoreductive Surgery for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Xiaohua Wu
2012-01-01
Abstract:Background and purpose:In order to achieve the maximal cytoredction with less influence on the ovarian cancer patients' quality of life,en bloc resection of pelvic tumor with involved resctosigmoid and anastomosis(modified posterior pelvic exenteration) is one of the important procedures.The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility,safety and efficacy of modified posterior pelvic exenteration in primary cytoreductive surgery among patients with epithelial ovarian cancer(EOC).Methods:Medical records of 50 patients with primary EOC underwent en bloc resection of pelvic tumor with low anterior resection and anastomosis between Jan.2006 to Dec.2010 were reviewed.Results:The mean age was 57 years(ranged from 37 to 85).There were 1 FIGO stageⅡc(2.0%),40 stage Ⅲc(80.0%) and 9 stage Ⅳ(18.0%) patients.Twenty-six patients(52.0%) underwent major upper abdominal procedures other than omentectomy.All anastomosis were performed by gynecologic oncologist without protective intestinal diversion,with 30 cases(60.0%) stapled and 20 cases(40.0%) hand-sewn.The mean operating time was 224 min(ranged from 150 to 320),mean estimated blood lost was 1 268 mL(ranged from 100 to 3 000) and mean red cell transfusion was 900 mL(ranged from 0 to 2 200).Of all the patients,84.0% were left with optimal(≤1 cm) residual disease.In 88.08% patients,tumor involvement of the rectum were confirmed histopathologically.There were no postoperative deaths,but postoperative morbidity occurred in 26% of patients,including 1 case of anastomotic leak and 1 case of recto-vaginal fistula(4.0%) and the stoma-free rate was 98.0%.Forty-eight patients received taxol and platinum combination chemotherapy,with a median overall survival time of 33.8 months.Conclusion:Modified posterior pelvic exenteration with concomitant rectosigmoid anastomosis allows a high rate of optimal debulking in primary cytoreduction for EOC.It is feasible as well as safety.Prophylactic ileostomy/colostomy was not recommended.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?