Abstract:Product harm crises are among a firm's worst nightmares.Brand equity is an important but fragile asset,which is easy to suffer loss in product harm crises.The mounting frequency of product harm crises and ill-prepared corporate response to such crises can have profound consequences for brand equity.Based on whether the product defects is a violation of regulation or safety standards,the product harm crises can be divided into two categories:defensible and indefensible product harm crises.This article discusses how to respond defensible product harm crises appropriately.By analyzing real defensible product harm crises in China,we found that companies responded to these crises differently,implying that they didn't reach consensus on which response was the best to protect brand equity in defensible product harm crises.To resolve the question that which response strategy is the most effective to protect brand equity in defensible product harm crises,this paper explores the impacts of response strategy,3rd part clarification,company reputation and psychological risk on brand equity.We implemented a 4(response strategy:defensive,attack,justification & accommoda-tive) × 2(company reputation:good & bad) × 2(3rd part clarification:with & without) between-group design,and empirical results are:(1) defensive response is the best,accommodative response is the worst,with other responses in the middle;(2) a 3rd part's clarification is more persuasive than that of companies and would narrow differences of company responses;(3) company reputation plays a positive moderating role,but only when the company implement defensive response and a 3rd part's clarification is available;(4) psychological risk is identified as a key mediator of brand equity in product harm crisis context,which indicates that response strategy,company reputation and 3rd part clarification impact on brand equity through psychological risk.These findings would help companies to better understand and protect their brand equities in defensible product harm crises.

Dynamic Pricing and Advertising Decisions to Mitigate the Negative Spillover Effect of a Product Recall

Should Ad Spending Increase or Decrease Before a Recall Announcement? the Marketing–Finance Interface in Product-Harm Crisis Management

Does a Firm's Product-Recall Strategy Affect Its Financial Value? an Examination of Strategic Alternatives During Product-Harm Crises

What Drives a Firm's Choice of Product Recall Remedy? the Impact of Remedy Cost, Product Hazard, and the CEO

The Role of Social Media in the Capital Market: Evidence from Consumer Product Recalls

Online Learning and Pricing for Multiple Products with Reference Price Effects

Consumer Search with Anticipated Regret

Too Much of a Good Thing? the Boomerang Effect of Firms’ Investments on Corporate Social Responsibility During Product Recalls

The Role of Corporate Reputation and Crisis Response Strategies in Data Breach Management.

Dynamic Quality and Advertising Decisions Considering Product Recalls in Supply Chain

Supply chain disruptions: the influence of industry and geography on firm reaction speed

An Empirical Study of the Volkswagen Recall Crisis in China: Customer's Risk Perceptions and Behavior Responses Based on an Information Flow

Research on the Influence of Protecting Brand Equity in the Event of Defensible Product Harm Crisis by Appropriate Remedial Response:Moderating and Mediating Effects

Strategic advertising in the aftermath of a corporate scandal

The crisis‐response match: An empirical investigation

Taming the Blame Game: Using Promotion Programs to Counter Product-Harm Crises

The Impact of Voluntary Recall on the Trust of Loyal and First-Time Consumers in a High Awareness Brand After a Functional Transgression

Social Media Strategies in Product-Harm Crises

Dynamic quality and advertising strategies in product-harm crises: The role of supply chain power structure

The dynamic interdependencies among the negativity and the positivity in news and user-generated content about safety in a firm's products and the firm's product recalls

Stock market reaction to product-harm crisis response strategies