Abstract:BackgroundScientifically sound and valid information concerning course and prediction of mental health problems in children and adolescents in the general population is scarce, although needed for public mental health issues and daily clinical practice.ObjectivesThe psychopathological profiles of children and adolescents were analysed using the parent version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-P) in a longitudinal setting, also investigating the predictive value of the SDQ-scores.MethodsSDQ’s total psychopathological difficulties, emotional symptoms and hyperactivity-inattention scores of n = 630 children and adolescents (age 6–18;11 years) were examined along four assessment measurement points (T0–T3) over 6 years, using data from the BELLA study. According to the English normative data, the participants were categorized as “normal”, “borderline” or “abnormal” based on their SDQ-scores. Groups remaining within categories were descriptively determined by means of frequency analysis, a subsequent graphical evaluation displayed the transitions from T0 to T3 concerning the different categorical classifications. Finally, ordered probit regression was used to examine whether age, gender, socio-economic status (SES) and baseline impact-score (IS) correspond to the SDQ-predicted classification.ResultsAs expected, low SES and high SDQ-IS were associated with significantly increased scores on all examined SDQ-scales. Regarding the long-term aspect of SDQ-scores it could be shown that most children and adolescents remained “normal” over a measurement period of 6 years, while only a small number of children and adolescents steadily remained “abnormal” or newly developed mental health problems, respectively. For example, on the “hyperactivity-inattention”-scale, only 1 % of the children and adolescents changed from “normal” to “abnormal” (T0–T3), whereas on the “emotional symptoms”-scale, 7 % changed from “normal” to “abnormal” (T0–T3). In general, the SDQ-category “borderline” and specifically the subscale “emotional symptoms” change in both directions. Abnormal SDQ-scores at baseline, SES, gender and IS were related to the prediction of the SDQ-sores at T3.ConclusionAn SDQ-screening of children and adolescents may help for early detection, prediction and treatment planning. Also, these results may contribute to a better understanding of the course of mental health problems in childhood and concurrently may allow a better psychoeducation and prevention.

Through the Parent's Eyes: Exploring the Relationship Between Parental Perceptions of Difficulties and SDQ Scale Results in Children and Adolescents

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a Valuable Screening Tool for Identifying Core Symptoms and Behavioural and Emotional Problems in Children with Neuropsychiatric Disorders

Mental Health Status of Children with Disorders of Sexual Development and Their Correlates

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a Predictor of Parent-Reported Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Child–parent agreement on the SDQ: The role of child–parent attachment and parental feelings

Spanish normative data of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a community-based sample of adolescents: Datos normativos españoles del Cuestionario de capacidades y dificultades (SDQ) en una muestra comunitaria de adolescentes

The Use of the SDQ with Chinese Adolescents in the Clinical Context

Spanish normative data of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a community-based sample of adolescents

Six years ahead: a longitudinal analysis regarding course and predictive value of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in children and adolescents

The assessment of emotional and Behavioural problems: Internal structure of The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

A systematic review of evidence for the psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

Results of the parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in 22,108 primary school students from 8 provinces of China

Psychometric properties of the preschool strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in UK 1-to-2-year-olds

The Validity, Reliability and Normative Scores of the Parent, Teacher and Self Report Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in China.

Measuring Adolescent Psychopathology: Psychometric Properties of the Self-Report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in A Sample of Chinese Adolescents

Validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for Screening and Diagnosis in Western Australian Adolescents

A study on the applicability of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire among low- and higher-educated adolescents

The psychosocial functioning in adolescents with severe obesity evaluated throughout the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ): a preliminary report

German Parents and Educators of Two to Four-Year-Old Children as Informants for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

Emotional problems across development: examining measurement invariance across childhood, adolescence and early adulthood

Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Adolescent Community and Clinical Populations