Abstract:BackgroundScientifically sound and valid information concerning course and prediction of mental health problems in children and adolescents in the general population is scarce, although needed for public mental health issues and daily clinical practice.ObjectivesThe psychopathological profiles of children and adolescents were analysed using the parent version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-P) in a longitudinal setting, also investigating the predictive value of the SDQ-scores.MethodsSDQ’s total psychopathological difficulties, emotional symptoms and hyperactivity-inattention scores of n = 630 children and adolescents (age 6–18;11 years) were examined along four assessment measurement points (T0–T3) over 6 years, using data from the BELLA study. According to the English normative data, the participants were categorized as “normal”, “borderline” or “abnormal” based on their SDQ-scores. Groups remaining within categories were descriptively determined by means of frequency analysis, a subsequent graphical evaluation displayed the transitions from T0 to T3 concerning the different categorical classifications. Finally, ordered probit regression was used to examine whether age, gender, socio-economic status (SES) and baseline impact-score (IS) correspond to the SDQ-predicted classification.ResultsAs expected, low SES and high SDQ-IS were associated with significantly increased scores on all examined SDQ-scales. Regarding the long-term aspect of SDQ-scores it could be shown that most children and adolescents remained “normal” over a measurement period of 6 years, while only a small number of children and adolescents steadily remained “abnormal” or newly developed mental health problems, respectively. For example, on the “hyperactivity-inattention”-scale, only 1 % of the children and adolescents changed from “normal” to “abnormal” (T0–T3), whereas on the “emotional symptoms”-scale, 7 % changed from “normal” to “abnormal” (T0–T3). In general, the SDQ-category “borderline” and specifically the subscale “emotional symptoms” change in both directions. Abnormal SDQ-scores at baseline, SES, gender and IS were related to the prediction of the SDQ-sores at T3.ConclusionAn SDQ-screening of children and adolescents may help for early detection, prediction and treatment planning. Also, these results may contribute to a better understanding of the course of mental health problems in childhood and concurrently may allow a better psychoeducation and prevention.

Child–parent agreement on the SDQ: The role of child–parent attachment and parental feelings

Mental Health Status of Children with Disorders of Sexual Development and Their Correlates

Through the Parent's Eyes: Exploring the Relationship Between Parental Perceptions of Difficulties and SDQ Scale Results in Children and Adolescents

German Parents and Educators of Two to Four-Year-Old Children as Informants for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a Predictor of Parent-Reported Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

When adolescents disagree with others about their symptoms: differences in attachment organization as an explanation of discrepancies between adolescent, parent, and peer reports of behavior problems

Discrepancies in parents’ and adolescents’ reports on parent-adolescent communication and associations to adolescents’ psychological health

Agreement Between Parents and Teachers on Preschool Children’s Behavior in a Clinical Sample with Externalizing Behavioral Problems

The Validity, Reliability and Normative Scores of the Parent, Teacher and Self Report Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in China.

Prospective associations between early childhood mental health concerns and formal diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders in adolescence

Correlates of Informant Discrepancies in Self-Harm Among Youth Involved in Child Protective Services

Six years ahead: a longitudinal analysis regarding course and predictive value of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in children and adolescents

Measuring Adolescent Psychopathology: Psychometric Properties of the Self-Report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in A Sample of Chinese Adolescents

Parent and Provider Differences in Ratings of Mental Health and Neurodevelopmental Concerns in Children with Neurologic Disorders

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a Valuable Screening Tool for Identifying Core Symptoms and Behavioural and Emotional Problems in Children with Neuropsychiatric Disorders

The Use of the SDQ with Chinese Adolescents in the Clinical Context

Results of the parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in 22,108 primary school students from 8 provinces of China

Measuring children's emotional and behavioural problems: are SDQ parent reports from native and immigrant parents comparable?

Parent-child agreement in different domains of child behavior and health

Caregiver and youth inter‐rater assessment agreement in autism spectrum disorder, developmental coordination disorder, and typical development

Factors influencing agreement between child self-report and parent proxy-reports on the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 (PedsQL) generic core scales