Acute evaluation of sport-related concussion and implications for the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT6) for adults, adolescents and children: a systematic review
Ruben J Echemendia,Joel S Burma,Jared M Bruce,Gavin A Davis,Christopher C Giza,Kevin M Guskiewicz,Dhiren Naidu,Amanda Marie Black,Steven Broglio,Simon Kemp,Jon S Patricios,Margot Putukian,Roger Zemek,Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla,Christopher M Bailey,Benjamin L Brett,Nyaz Didehbani,Gerry Gioia,Stanley A Herring,David Howell,Christina L Master,Tamara C Valovich McLeod,William P Meehan 3rd,Zahra Premji,Danielle Salmon,Jacqueline van Ierssel,Neil Bhathela,Michael Makdissi,Samuel R Walton,James Kissick,Jamie Pardini,Kathryn J Schneider
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-106661
Abstract:Objectives: To systematically review the scientific literature regarding the acute assessment of sport-related concussion (SRC) and provide recommendations for improving the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT6). Data sources: Systematic searches of seven databases from 2001 to 2022 using key words and controlled vocabulary relevant to concussion, sports, SCAT, and acute evaluation. Eligibility criteria: (1) Original research articles, cohort studies, case-control studies, and case series with a sample of >10; (2) ≥80% SRC; and (3) studies using a screening tool/technology to assess SRC acutely (<7 days), and/or studies containing psychometric/normative data for common tools used to assess SRC. Data extraction: Separate reviews were conducted involving six subdomains: Cognition, Balance/Postural Stability, Oculomotor/Cervical/Vestibular, Emerging Technologies, and Neurological Examination/Autonomic Dysfunction. Paediatric/Child studies were included in each subdomain. Risk of Bias and study quality were rated by coauthors using a modified SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network) tool. Results: Out of 12 192 articles screened, 612 were included (189 normative data and 423 SRC assessment studies). Of these, 183 focused on cognition, 126 balance/postural stability, 76 oculomotor/cervical/vestibular, 142 emerging technologies, 13 neurological examination/autonomic dysfunction, and 23 paediatric/child SCAT. The SCAT discriminates between concussed and non-concussed athletes within 72 hours of injury with diminishing utility up to 7 days post injury. Ceiling effects were apparent on the 5-word list learning and concentration subtests. More challenging tests, including the 10-word list, were recommended. Test-retest data revealed limitations in temporal stability. Studies primarily originated in North America with scant data on children. Conclusion: Support exists for using the SCAT within the acute phase of injury. Maximal utility occurs within the first 72 hours and then diminishes up to 7 days after injury. The SCAT has limited utility as a return to play tool beyond 7 days. Empirical data are limited in pre-adolescents, women, sport type, geographical and culturally diverse populations and para athletes. Prospero registration number: CRD42020154787.