A - 06 Examining Consumer Feedback on the 2023 International Conference Consensus Statement on Concussion In Sport

R Magill,C Vaughan,R Echemendia,W Kringler,C Bailey
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae052.06
2024-07-06
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Abstract:Abstract Purpose The 6th International Conference on Concussion in Sport distilled its main outcomes and recommendations into a consensus statement, which will likely have significant influence on the evaluation and management of sport-concussion. This abstract examines opinions on the statement among healthcare providers, including those who contributed to the conference and those who did not. Method A survey was designed with minor concussion-specific modifications using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation 2nd edition (AGREE II) framework. This framework features 6 domains evaluated on a 7-point Likert scale - Scope and Purpose, Stakeholder Involvement, Rigour of Development, Clarity of Presentation, Applicability, and Editorial Independence. 72 participants completed the survey, including neuropsychologists (29.2%), physicians (31.9%), and athletic trainers (31.9%). The majority were not involved in the statement (71.8%). Results The Scope and Purpose domain was most favorably endorsed (80.3%), followed by Rigour of Development (76%), Clarity of Presentation (74%), Editorial Independence (72.1%) and Stakeholder Involvement (70.7%). The Applicability domain was least favorably endorsed (69.5%). The majority of domain ratings did not differ significantly among healthcare providers, except for the Stakeholder Involvement and Applicability domains were rated higher by athletic trainers than physicians (p = 0.011, p = 0.007, respectively). No differences in opinions across the six domains were found between those who did and did not contribute to the statement. Conclusions Overall, the consensus statement was rated favorably by survey participants. Lower ratings in the Applicability domain suggest an area for improvement when developing future consensus statements.
psychology, clinical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?