Abstract:Background: The non-invasive estimation of aortic systolic (aoSBP) and pulse pressure (aoPP) is achieved by a great variety of devices, which differ markedly in the: 1) principles of recording (applied technology), 2) arterial recording site, 3) model and mathematical analysis applied to signals, and/or 4) calibration scheme. The most reliable non-invasive procedure to obtain aoSBP and aoPP is not well established. Aim: To evaluate the agreement between aoSBP and aoPP values invasively and non-invasively obtained using different: 1) recording techniques (tonometry, oscilometry/plethysmography, ultrasound), 2) recording sites [radial, brachial (BA) and carotid artery (CCA)], 3) waveform analysis algorithms (e.g., direct analysis of the CCA pulse waveform vs. peripheral waveform analysis using general transfer functions, N-point moving average filters, etc.), 4) calibration schemes (systolic-diastolic calibration vs. methods using BA diastolic and mean blood pressure (bMBP); the latter calculated using different equations vs. measured directly by oscillometry, and 5) different equations to estimate bMBP (i.e., using a form factor of 33% ("033"), 41.2% ("0412") or 33% corrected for heart rate ("033HR"). Methods: The invasive aortic (aoBP) and brachial pressure (bBP) (catheterization), and the non-invasive aoBP and bBP were simultaneously obtained in 34 subjects. Non-invasive aoBP levels were obtained using different techniques, analysis methods, recording sites, and calibration schemes. Results: 1) Overall, non-invasive approaches yielded lower aoSBP and aoPP levels than those recorded invasively. 2) aoSBP and aoPP determinations based on CCA recordings, followed by BA recordings, were those that yielded values closest to those recorded invasively. 3) The "033HR" and "0412" calibration schemes ensured the lowest mean error, and the "033" method determined aoBP levels furthest from those recorded invasively. 4) Most of the non-invasive approaches considered overestimated and underestimated aoSBP at low (i.e., 80 mmHg) and high (i.e., 180 mmHg) invasive aoSBP values, respectively. 5) The higher the invasively measured aoPP, the higher the level of underestimation provided by the non-invasive methods. Conclusion: The recording method and site, the mathematical method/model used to quantify aoSBP and aoPP, and to calibrate waveforms, are essential when estimating aoBP. Our study strongly emphasizes the need for methodological transparency and consensus for the non-invasive aoBP assessment.

Fundamentals of utilizing upstroke time and percentage mean arterial pressure of ankle pulse volume recording as cardiovascular indexes

Non-contact Monitoring of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Based on Webcam

Feasibility of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to predict cardiovascular outcome in stroke survivors

Blood Pressure Estimation Based on the Timing of the Arterial Reflected Waves by Oscillometric Pulse Wave Decomposition

Arterial Blood Pressure Feature Estimation Using Photoplethysmography

Upstroke time is a more useful marker of atherosclerosis than percentage of mean arterial pressure for detecting coronary artery disease in subjects with a normal ankle-brachial index

Central arterial pressure and arterial pressure pulse: new views entering the second century after Korotkov.

Pulse pressure amplification as a hemodynamic predictor of cardiovascular disease

Wrist Pulse Recording With a Wearable Piezoresistor-Piezoelectret Compound Sensing System and Its Applications in Health Monitoring

Correlation Analysis of Ankle-Brachial Index and Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity with Cardiac Structures and Functions in Patients with Essential Hypertension

Increasing accuracy of pulse arrival time estimation in low frequency recordings

THE FEASIBILITY OF CUFFLESS, NON-OCCLUSIVE BLOOD PRESSURE ASSESSMENTS USING THE NOVEL LIFELEAF WRISTWATCH AND PLATFORM

Significance of measurement of arterial stiffness in peripheral arteries

Arteriosclerosis Assessment based on Single‐Point Fingertip Pulse Monitoring Using a Wearable Iontronic Sensor

Continuous and Noninvasive Measurement of Arterial Pulse Pressure and Pressure Waveform using an Image-free Ultrasound System

Innovations in blood pressure measurement and reporting technology: International Society of Hypertension position paper endorsed by the World Hypertension League, European Society of Hypertension, Asian Pacific Society of Hypertension, and Latin American Society of Hypertension

Accurate Fiducial Point Detection Using Haar Wavelet for Beat-by-Beat Blood Pressure Estimation

BLOOD PRESSURE ESTIMATION FROM PPG-BASED PULSE ARRIVAL TIME

Twenty-Four-Hour Ambulatory Pulse Wave Analysis in Hypertension Management: Current Evidence and Perspectives

Home Blood Pressure Monitoring: Current Status and New Developments

Aortic systolic and pulse pressure invasively and non-invasively obtained: Comparative analysis of recording techniques, arterial sites of measurement, waveform analysis algorithms and calibration methods