Surgical treatment of fallopian tubal pregnancy and interstitial pregnancy has no differential effect on intrauterine pregnancy after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer

Mingxiang Zheng,Yangqin Peng,Pei Cai,Qingwen He,Gong Fei,Chen Hui,Yuyao Mao,Xihong Li,Yan Ouyang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06943-9
2024-11-25
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Abstract:Due to the specific nature of interstitial pregnancy (IP), there are significant risks to both the mother and the foetus in women with a heterotopic interstitial pregnancy (HIP). IP alone has been analysed as a site-specific ectopic pregnancy (EP) in previous studies; however, according to the latest European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology criteria, IP is classified as a tubal pregnancy. If IP can be classified as a tubal pregnancy, then there is no difference in the effects of these two methods on intrauterine pregnancies (IUPs). Under the premise of timely surgery, disposing of IPs and tubal pregnancy (excluding IPs) should also have no differential effect on IUPs.
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?