Analysis of Therapeutic Effects of Three Different Treatments to Tubal Pregnancy

JIA Jigang,Hua Keqin,Zhang Qin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-6946.2008.04.019
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the rational therapeutic protocol in treatment of tubal pregnancy.Methods:The cases hospitalized for tubal pregnancy were reviewed and were divided to three groups according to therapeutic method, conservative medicine therapy, conservative surgery and radical surgery. After the treatment, restoration of oviduct, intrauterine pregnancy, and subsequent fertility were compared.Results:The patent rate of fallopian tube was 55.3% and 94.9% in medicine therapy group and conservative surgery group separately, the difference was statistically significant. Intrauterine pregnant rate was 66.4%, 50.0%, and 48.3% in conservative surgery, medicine therapy, and radical surgery, respectively, which significant difference among three groups. Recurrent ectopic pregnant rate among three groups was no statistically significant.Conclusions:Radical surgery is suitable for with bulky lesion and normal lateral tube, which destroyed the integrity of reproductive tract and must be careful to apply with young women whom hope to preserve fertility. Medicine therapy has no trauma and cheap, but the follow-up is long, failure rate is higher and it has some influence on tubal obstruction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?