Abstract:Background: Electric field (E-field) modeling is a potent tool to estimate the amount of transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation (TMS and tES, respectively) that reaches the cortex and to address the variable behavioral effects observed in the field. However, outcome measures used to quantify E-fields vary considerably and a thorough comparison is missing. Objectives: This two-part study aimed to examine the different outcome measures used to report on tES and TMS induced E-fields, including volume- and surface-level gray matter, region of interest (ROI), whole brain, geometrical, structural, and percentile-based approaches. The study aimed to guide future research in informed selection of appropriate outcome measures. Methods: Three electronic databases were searched for tES and/or TMS studies quantifying E-fields. The identified outcome measures were compared across volume- and surface-level E-field data in ten tES and TMS modalities targeting two common targets in 100 healthy individuals. Results: In the systematic review, we extracted 308 outcome measures from 202 studies that adopted either a gray matter volume-level (n = 197) or surface-level (n = 111) approach. Volume-level results focused on E-field magnitude, while surface-level data encompassed E-field magnitude (n = 64) and normal/tangential E-field components (n = 47). E-fields were extracted in ROIs, such as brain structures and shapes (spheres, hexahedra and cylinders), or the whole brain. Percentiles or mean values were mostly used to quantify E-fields. Our modeling study, which involved 1,000 E-field models and > 1,000,000 extracted E-field values, revealed that different outcome measures yielded distinct E-field values, analyzed different brain regions, and did not always exhibit strong correlations in the same within-subject E-field model. Conclusions: Outcome measure selection significantly impacts the locations and intensities of extracted E-field data in both tES and TMS E-field models. The suitability of different outcome measures depends on the target region, TMS/tES modality, individual anatomy, the analyzed E-field component and the research question. To enhance the quality, rigor, and reproducibility in the E-field modeling domain, we suggest standard reporting practices across studies and provide four recommendations.

Impact of modeled field of view in electroconvulsive therapy current flow simulations

Head models of healthy and depressed adults for simulating the electric fields of non-invasive electric brain stimulation

Comparison of electric field strength and spatial distribution of electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy in a realistic human head model

Computational Models of High-Definition Electroconvulsive Therapy for Focal or Multitargeting Treatment

Amplitude-determined seizure-threshold, electric field modeling, and electroconvulsive therapy antidepressant and cognitive outcomes

Intracranial Electric Field Recording During Multichannel Transcranial Electrical Stimulation

In vivo Measurements of Electric Fields During Cranial Electrical Stimulation in the Human Brain

Electroconvulsive Therapy With Brain Cyst: A Simulation Study

How The Macroscopic Electric Field Shape Spatio-Temporal Response Of Neurons By Electroconvulsive Therapy

Outcome measures for electric field modeling in tES and TMS: A systematic review and large-scale modeling study

Impact of glioma peritumoral edema, tumor size, and tumor location on alternating electric fields (AEF) therapy in realistic 3D rat glioma models: a computational study

Standard Non-Personalized Electric Field Modeling of Twenty Typical tDCS Electrode Configurations via the Computational Finite Element Method: Contributions and Limitations of Two Different Approaches

3D modeling of the total electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation using the boundary element method

Head model and electrical source imaging: a study of 38 epileptic patients

Differences in electric field strength between clinical and non-clinical populations induced by prefrontal tDCS: A cross-diagnostic, individual MRI-based modeling study

Effect of Electrode Geometry on Deep Brain Stimulation: Monopolar Point Source vs. Medtronic 3389 Lead

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients after Decompressive Craniectomy: a Finite Element Model to Investigate Factors Affecting the Cortical Electric Field

Investigating the electric field distribution in the human brain model induced by a high focality transcranial magnetic coil

Addressing the sources of inter-subject variability in E-field parameters in anodal tDCS stimulation over motor cortical network

An Integrated Multi-physics Finite Element Modeling Framework for Deep Brain Stimulation: Preliminary Study on Impact of Brain Shift on Neuronal Pathways

Enabling Electric Field Model of Microscopically Realistic Brain