Self-Prophecies and Cognitive Dissonance: Habit, Norms and Justification of Past Behavior
L. Rodrigues,F. Girandola
2017-03-01
Abstract:Asking an individual to predict his behavior increases the likelihood that it will occur (Sherman, 1980). This refers to the self-prophecy effect. Self-prophecies are a source of psychological discomfort (Spangenberg, Sprott, Grohmann, & Smith, 2003), a characteristic of the state of cognitive dissonance as defined by Festinger (1957). According to the theory of cognitive dissonance, an individual is susceptible to experience a state of psychological discomfort when two cognitions (e.g., attitude, belief, behavior) maintain an inconsistent relation. For example, taken together, the cognitions "I don't recycle" (behavior) and "I should recycle" (beliefs) are inconsistent. The psychological discomfort generated by this cognitive inconsistency can be reduced, for example, by changing behavior (e.g., Aronson, Fried, & Stone, 1991). According to Spangenberg and his collaborators, the theory of cognitive dissonance would explain the effect of self-prophecies (Spangenberg & Greenwald, 1999; Spangenberg, Sprott, Grohmann, & Smith, 2003; Spangenberg et al., 2012). Self-prophecies consist in asking an individual to predict his/her behavior by answering a question, for example, "Can you predict that you will recycle?" (Spangenberg et al., 2012). Answering such a prediction question favors behavioral induction (Sherman, 1980). Works in this field show that the target behavior is adopted more often when the participants are asked to predict their behavior (Spangenberg & Greenwald, 1999, 2001). The effect of self-prophecies has been tested in various areas, particularly concerning civic behaviors (Greenwald, Carnot, Beach, & Young, 1987; Greenwald, Klinger, Vande Kamp, & Kerr, 1988; Smith, Gerber, & Orlich, 2003), charity (Obermiller & Spangenberg, 2000; Obermiller, Spangenberg, & Atwood, 1992), health (Spangenberg & Sprott, 2006; Sprott, Smith, Spangenberg, & Freson, 2004; Sprott, Spangenberg, & Fisher, 2003), and even environmental protection (Spangenberg et al., 2003; Sprott, Spangenberg, & Perkins, 1999). Obermiller and Spangenberg (2000), for example, showed that self-prophecies can encourage charitable behaviors. Participants who were led to predict their behavior were significantly more likely to agree to make a donation (49%) than participants who did not make a prediction (30%). On average, these participants also gave significantly more money ($20) than the participants in the control group ($12). In the field of environmental protection, Sprott et al. (1999) asked participants to predict their recycling behavior by answering the following question: "You are using a lot of products that come in containers/packages/cans that can be recycled. Do you predict that: a) You will not recycle, b) You will recycle." (Sprott et al., 1999, p.8). The participants who predicted their behavior by answering the question recycled significantly more cans (30.53) than the participants who were not solicited to make a prediction (18.11). Thus, asking someone to predict his/her behavior increases the probability that it will occur (Spangenberg & Greenwald, 1999, 2001). Several authors have stated that this effect is based on a process of reducing cognitive dissonance (e.g., Spangenberg et al., 2003, 2012). Adopting the target behavior reduces psychological discomfort generated by the inconsistency between two cognitions. According to this interpretation, answering a prediction question would make salient two potentially contradictory cognitions, i.e., 1) past transgressive behavior (e.g., "I don't recycle") and 2) normative beliefs associated with the target behavior (e.g. "I should recycle"). On one hand, by predicting one's behavior, an individual would become aware of what he/she does or does not do, in other words of his/her past behavior, and, on the other hand, of what he/she thinks should be done, in other words what is socially and morally good to do (Spangenberg et al. …
Psychology