Analysis and Countermeasure on Vulnerability of WPA Key Exchange Mechanism

Yousung Kang,Kyunghee Oh,Byung-ho Chung,Kyoil Chung,Daehun Nyang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25978-7_92

2004-02-18

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Consideration of Future Consequences and Self-Control Mediate the Impact of Time Perspectives on Self-Rated Health and Engagement in Healthy Lifestyles among Young Adults

Mengxi Guo,Yiling Lou,Ning Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03135-6

IF: 2.8

2022-01-01

Current Psychology

Abstract:The study investigated how different time perspectives predict people's self-rated health and engagement in healthy lifestyles, and explored the mediating effects of consideration of future consequences (CFC) and self-control as the underlying mechanisms. Young adults (n = 299, M-age = 23.65, ranges from 18 to 30 years old) completed measures of time perspectives, CFC, self-control and engagement in daily health behaviors. Generalized linear regression models showed that Past-Negative time perspective negatively predicted sleep quality; Future time perspective negatively predicted unhealthy eating patterns; Future time perspective was the only protective factor of risky drinking, while both Past-Positive and Future time perspective were protective factors of smoking. Mediation analyses showed that CFC-Immediate and self-control mediated the relationship between Future time perspective and eating patterns. Results suggested that consideration of future consequences and self-control partially explained how time perspectives affect engagement in healthy lifestyles among young Chinese adults. Implications of the current research for promoting healthy living and directions for future research are discussed.
Are trait self-control and self-control resources mediators of relations between executive functions and health behaviors?

Cyril Forestier,Margaux de Chanaleilles,Roxane Bartoletti,Boris Cheval,Aïna Chalabaev,Thibault Deschamps

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102410

IF: 5.118

2023-07-01

Psychology of Sport and Exercise

Abstract:This study investigated associations between executive functions (i.e., inhibition, working memory, cognitive flexibility) and individual differences in self-control and health behaviors. We examined whether executive functions predict physical activity, sedentary activity, and healthy and unhealthy diets, and whether trait self-control and self-control resources mediate these associations. Three hundred and eighty-five participants completed a questionnaire assessing trait self-control and self-control resources, physical activity, sedentary activity, and healthy and unhealthy diets. They also performed three randomly ordered cognitive tasks, a stop-signal task (i.e., inhibition), a letter memory task (i.e., updating), and a number-letter task (i.e., switching). Structural equation modeling revealed that self-control resources predicted positively physical activity (R2 = 0.08), negatively sedentary activity (R2 = 0.03) and positively healthy diet (R2 = 10). Moreover, trait self-control predicted positively healthy diet (R2 = 0.10) and negatively unhealthy diet (R2 = 0.19). Moreover, analyses revealed that switching significantly predicted self-control resources, and highlighted three totally mediated relations between this executive function and physical activity, sedentary activity and healthy diet. However, no evidence was found supporting associations between inhibition and updating, and health behaviors, or relations mediated by self-control for these executive functions. The findings suggest the importance of trait self-control and self-control resources for health behavior adoption and pave the way for studies exploring the role of the executive functions in an affective context. Open materials [https://osf.io/hpsjw/].

sport sciences,psychology, applied,hospitality, leisure, sport & tourism
More than resisting temptation: Beneficial habits mediate the relationship between self-control and positive life outcomes.

Brian M. Galla,Angela L. Duckworth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000026

IF: 8.46

2015-09-01

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract:Why does self-control predict such a wide array of positive life outcomes? Conventional wisdom holds that self-control is used to effortfully inhibit maladaptive impulses, yet this view conflicts with emerging evidence that self-control is associated with less inhibition in daily life. We propose that one of the reasons individuals with better self-control use less effortful inhibition, yet make better progress on their goals is that they rely on beneficial habits. Across 6 studies (total N = 2,274), we found support for this hypothesis. In Study 1, habits for eating healthy snacks, exercising, and getting consistent sleep mediated the effect of self-control on both increased automaticity and lower reported effortful inhibition in enacting those behaviors. In Studies 2 and 3, study habits mediated the effect of self-control on reduced motivational interference during a work-leisure conflict and on greater ability to study even under difficult circumstances. In Study 4, homework habits mediated the effect of self-control on classroom engagement and homework completion. Study 5 was a prospective longitudinal study of teenage youth who participated in a 5-day meditation retreat. Better self-control before the retreat predicted stronger meditation habits 3 months after the retreat, and habits mediated the effect of self-control on successfully accomplishing meditation practice goals. Finally, in Study 6, study habits mediated the effect of self-control on homework completion and 2 objectively measured long-term academic outcomes: grade point average and first-year college persistence. Collectively, these results suggest that beneficial habits-perhaps more so than effortful inhibition-are an important factor linking self-control with positive life outcomes.

psychology, social
Psychological Determinants of Health Behavior

Martin S. Hagger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020124-114222

IF: 27.782

2024-11-07

Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract:This review provides a critical overview of current evidence on psychological health behavior determinants and its value in informing intervention and future determinants research. The review begins with work labeling and classifying the myriads of determinants available in the extant research to arrive at core groups of determinants. Next, the conceptual bases of these determinant groups are identified, and the weight of the evidence for their purported effects on health behavior, including belief-based determinants (e.g., outcome expectancies, capacity beliefs), determinants representing self-regulatory capacity (e.g., planning, action control) and nonconscious processes (e.g., habit, implicit cognition), and dispositional determinants (e.g., personality, regulatory control), is critically evaluated. The review also focuses on the theory-based mechanisms underpinning determinant effects and moderating conditions that magnify or diminish them. Finally, the review recommends a shift away from research on determinants as correlates, outlines how determinants can inform intervention development and mechanisms of action tests, suggests alternatives to predominant individualist approaches, and proposes future research directions.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Social cognition, personality and social-political correlates of health behaviors: Application of an integrated theoretical model

Zoe M. Griffith,Juho Polet,Taru Lintunen,Kyra Hamilton,Martin S. Hagger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116779

IF: 5.379

2024-03-18

Social Science & Medicine

Abstract:Objective Dispositional, intra-personal constructs such as personality traits and generalized beliefs are consistently related to health behaviors, but relatively few studies have tested the theory-based mechanisms by which these constructs relate to health behaviors and compared them across behavior type. In the current study we tested an integrated theoretical model in which belief-based social cognition constructs (attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control) were proposed to mediate effects of personality traits (conscientiousness, extroversion) and socio-political beliefs (political beliefs, locus of control, free will beliefs) on participation in three health-related behaviors: physical activity, COVID-19 vaccination, and sugar-sweetened beverage restriction. Methods Proposed integrated model effects were tested in a five-week prospective correlational study. Finnish residents completed measures of personality, socio-political, and social cognition constructs with respect to physical activity participation ( N = 557), COVID-19 vaccination uptake ( N = 1,115), and sugar-sweetened beverage restriction ( N = 558) and self-reported their behavior at follow-up. Results Structural equation models revealed direct effects of intention on behavior, and of social-cognition constructs on intention, across all behaviors. We also found indirect effects of political beliefs on behavior mediated by social cognition constructs and intentions for COVID-19 vaccination and sugar-sweetened beverage restriction behaviors, indirect effects of conscientiousness on behavior mediated by social cognition constructs and intentions for physical activity and sugar-sweetened beverage restriction behaviors, and indirect effects of health locus of control on behavior mediated by social cognition constructs and intentions for physical activity behavior. Finally, we found a negative total effect of populist beliefs on behavior for COVID-19 vaccination behavior. Conclusion Findings contribute to an evidence base for the effects of dispositional and social cognition constructs of health behaviors, point to a possible mechanism by which these generalized constructs relate to health behavior, and outline how the pattern of effects varies across the different behaviors.

public, environmental & occupational health,social sciences, biomedical
A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Health Belief Model Variables in Predicting Behavior

Christopher J. Carpenter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2010.521906

IF: 3.501

2010-11-30

Health Communication

Abstract:The Health Belief Model (HBM; Rosenstock, 1966) was constructed to explain which beliefs should be targeted in communication campaigns to cause positive health behaviors. The model specifies that if individuals perceive a negative health outcome to be severe, perceive themselves to be susceptible to it, perceive the benefits to behaviors that reduce the likelihood of that outcome to be high, and perceive the barriers to adopting those behaviors to be low, then the behavior is likely for those individuals. A meta-analysis of 18 studies (2,702 subjects) was conducted to determine whether measures of these beliefs could longitudinally predict behavior. Benefits and barriers were consistently the strongest predictors. The length of time between measurement of the HBM beliefs and behavior, prevention versus treatment behaviors, and drug-taking regimens versus other behaviors were identified as moderators of the HBM variables' predictive power. Based on the weakness of two of the predictors, the continued use of the direct effects version of the HBM is not recommended.

health policy & services,communication
The fable of state self-control

Michael Inzlicht,Brent W Roberts

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101848

Abstract:Trait self-control is highly valued, often equated with moral righteousness and associated with numerous positive life outcomes. This paper challenges the conventional conflation of trait self-control and state self-control. We suggest that while trait self-control is consistently linked to success, state self-control is not the causal mechanism driving these benefits. Trait self-control, sometimes also referred to as conscientiousness, grit, and the ability to delay gratification, predicts better health, wealth, and academic achievement. Conventional wisdom has it that people high in trait self-control reap all these benefits because they engage in more state self-control, defined as the momentary act of resolving conflict between goals and fleeting desires. Despite its intuitive appeal, there are problems with extolling state self-control because of our love for trait self-control. First, empirical evidence suggests that individuals high in trait self-control do not engage in more state self-control but engage it less. Second, changes to state self-control do not reliably and sustainably improve people's outcomes, as least in the long-term. And third, despite the possibility of dramatic improvements in trait self-control, these improvements are often short lived, with people returning to their baseline trait level over longer time horizons. The roots of this problem are numerous: Imprecise and inaccurate naming of our constructs that lead to construct drift and contamination; ignoring the numerous other facets of conscientiousness like orderliness or industriousness; and not appreciating that traits are sometimes not reducible to states. We suggest that the celebrated benefits of trait self-control arise from mechanisms beyond state self-control and highlight the need for a broader conceptualization of self-control in psychological research and practical interventions.
High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success.

R. Baumeister,A. Boone,June P Tangney

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.0022-3506.2004.00263.X

IF: 5.429

2004-04-01

Journal of Personality

Abstract:What good is self-control? We incorporated a new measure of individual differences in self-control into two large investigations of a broad spectrum of behaviors. The new scale showed good internal consistency and retest reliability. Higher scores on self-control correlated with a higher grade point average, better adjustment (fewer reports of psychopathology, higher self-esteem), less binge eating and alcohol abuse, better relationships and interpersonal skills, secure attachment, and more optimal emotional responses. Tests for curvilinearity failed to indicate any drawbacks of so-called overcontrol, and the positive effects remained after controlling for social desirability. Low self-control is thus a significant risk factor for a broad range of personal and interpersonal problems.

Medicine,Psychology
Perceived behavioral control moderating effects in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis.

Martin S. Hagger,Mike W.-L. Cheung,Icek Ajzen,Kyra Hamilton,Mike W. -L. Cheung

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001153

2022-02-01

Health Psychology

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: According to the theory of planned behavior, individuals are more likely to act on their behavioral intentions, and report intentions aligned with their attitudes and subjective norm, when their perceived behavioral control (PBC) is high. We tested these predictions meta-analytically by estimating the moderating effect of PBC on the attitude-intention, subjective norm-intention, and the intention-behavior relations in studies applying the theory in the health behavior domain.METHOD: We conducted a preregistered secondary analysis of studies (k = 39, total N = 13,121) from two programs of research. Each study measured participants' attitude, subjective norms, PBC, and intentions in relation to health behaviors, and most (k = 36) measured health behavior at follow-up. Data were analyzed using meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Behavior type, scale score coverage, sample age, and publication states were included as moderators of model effects.RESULTS: PBC moderated the intention-behavior relation but not the attitude-intention and subjective norm-intention relations. All moderation effects exhibited significant heterogeneity. Analysis of moderators indicated that the PBC moderation effects on intention varied according to scale score coverage but not by the other moderator variables tested.CONCLUSIONS: Results support moderation of the intention-behavior relation by PBC in health behaviors. However, substantial unresolved heterogeneity in the effect across studies remained. Further, these effects may not generalize to other populations and moderator analyses were confined to broad categories. More research that tests these moderation effects in health behavior contexts and reports sufficient data necessary for conducting a meta-analysis is needed to enable moderator analyses with greater fidelity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

psychology, clinical
Motivational dynamics of self-control

Kaitlyn M Werner,Elliot T Berkman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101859

2024-08-08

Abstract:How people respond to desires varies substantially across time and situations. Building on recent theoretical developments, we propose that motivation plays a central role in the dynamics of self-control as it unfolds across time. We illustrate the role of motivation in self-control by highlighting evidence that pursuing goals for intrinsic (vs. extrinsic) reasons plays a key role in shaping when and how people engage in self-control in service to their goals. We then expand this framework by outlining several promising directions for future research, specifically emphasizing the dynamic interplay between motivation and self-control at various stages in the regulation process. Ultimately, we posit that motivation is a key factor in helping people flexibly regulate desires in accordance with situational demands.
Toward controlling of a pandemic: How self-control ability influences willingness to take the COVID-19 vaccine

Yu Cao,Heng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111447

IF: 3.95

2022-04-01

Personality and Individual Differences

Abstract:What influences people's vaccine attitudes and intentions in the combat against the COVID-19 pandemic? Extending beyond health factors, the present research examines whether non-health-specific factors-such as one's self-control ability-influence individual attitudes toward vaccination. Drawing on the social psychology literature, we propose that self-control, which is often associated with adherence to social norms and with engagement in socially desirable behaviors, can lead to more favorable attitudes toward vaccines. Study 1 provided correlational evidence for our theoretical perspective that students scoring high on trait self-control expressed less vaccine hesitancy than students scoring low on self-control. Employing a more representative population, Study 2 examined the relationship with behaviors. It was found that non-student adults with higher self-control strength levels were more likely to accept vaccine appointments opportunities than those with lower self-control strength levels. Using an experimental design, Study 3 found that participants exerting a high level of effort for attentional self-control in the incongruent Stroop task condition showed lower COVID-19 vaccine acceptance than participants in the congruent condition. In sum, our research provides the first experimental evidence that high self-control can have a reliable impact on individual perceptions of vaccination.

psychology, social
Rethinking the Measurement of Self-Control: Distinguishing Among Self-Control Capacity, Urge Intensity, and Behavior Outcomes

Shannon W. Schrader,June P. Tangney

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2024.2415920

2024-11-09

Basic and Applied Social Psychology

Abstract:This paper highlights current advances and limitations in self-control assessment and suggests several avenues to improve measurement of this construct. We begin by underscoring the importance of assessing self-control capacity as opposed to behavioral outcomes. In addition, we explicitly include in the model an independent consideration of urge intensity (the strength of impulses). Whether one is interested in self-control processes at the state or trait level, in general or with respect to behavior in a specific domain, research questions can be enriched by employing measurement strategies that distinguish among self-control capacity, urge intensity, and outcomes. Such improved assessments can translate into more effective interventions by helping clinicians decide whether to differentially focus on ameliorating urges, enhancing self-control capacity, or both.

psychology, social
Physical activity automaticity, intention, and trait self-control as predictors of physical activity behavior – a dual-process perspective

Ines Pfeffer,Tilo Strobach

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1842472

2020-11-11

Psychology, Health and Medicine

Abstract:Dual-process theories assume that physical activity (PA) behavior is regulated by two different processes: impulsive (i.e., automatic, fast) and reflective (i.e., effortful, slow) processes. In this study we examined main effects as well as the interaction of reflective (intention and trait self-control)and impulsive (automaticity)processes on PA behavior. A prospective study with two points of measurement (N = 118 university students) was conducted. At t1, age, sex, past PA behavior (control variables), PA intention, automaticity and trait self-control (predictors) were assessed with standardized questionnaires. At t2 (4 weeks later), PA behavior (dependent variable) was measured with a standardized questionnaire. Hierarchical multiple linear regression analysis revealed that automaticity was associated with PA behavior. The expected interaction effects Intention x Trait Self-control and Automaticity x Intention x Trait self-control on PA were significant. Moderation analyses revealed that PA intention has a significant positive association with PA behavior when trait self-control was higher compared to lower. Furthermore, automaticity has the strongest association with behavior when both intention and trait self-control where lower compared to higher. Our results underline the additive and interactive effects of impulsive and reflective processes in regulating PA behavior.
The role of executive functioning on the intention-behaviour relationship of health behaviours: a temporal self-regulatory perspective

William S. Frye,Steven K. Shapiro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2020.1767778

2020-05-18

Psychology and Health

Abstract:Objective: The current study employed the Temporal Self-Regulation theory (TST) to determine if self-regulatory capacity and prepotent behaviour moderate the relationship between intention and health behaviours (i.e., physical activity, and healthy eating) in college students.Design: 220 students were surveyed across two time points to assess past/intended behaviour (Time 1) and follow-up behaviour (Time 2).Main Outcome Measures: To address limitations in previous research, self-regulatory capacity was assessed using an ecologically valid rating scale (Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale). Multi-item assessment measures were utilised for physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) and healthy eating (All-Day Screener) behaviours.Results: A link between intention and follow-up behaviour was established and executive functioning (EF) and past behaviours were positively associated with follow-up behaviour. EF had no unique moderation effects on health behaviours, but combinations of Low, Moderate, and High levels of past behaviour and EF demonstrated moderation for physical activity and healthy eating.Conclusion: This study demonstrated the utility of the TST in predicting health behaviour and emphasised the mutual necessity of EF and past behaviour in understanding the intention-behaviour relationship. Findings can be used to formulate studies and interventions that reduce barriers to health behaviours, therefore, lessening the need for high self-regulatory abilities.

public, environmental & occupational health,psychology, multidisciplinary
It Is Not Just a Matter of Motivation: The Role of Self-Control in Promoting Physical Activity in Older Adults—A Bayesian Mediation Model

Nicola Camp,Roberto Vagnetti,Samuel Penner,Catarina Ramos,Kirsty Hunter,John Hough,Daniele Magistro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12161663

2024-08-22

Health Care

Abstract:This study aimed to understand how psychological factors affect regular exercise in older adults, hypothesising that trait self-control mediates the relationship between motivation types (intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation) and exercise time. In this cross-sectional study, 430 older adults (mean age = 68.8 ± 6.72) completed questionnaires regarding their perceived trait self-control, motivation towards leisure activities, and level of physical activity. A Bayesian mediation analysis was performed, controlling for demographics. We documented positive direct (c′ = 0.021, 95%CI [0.001, 0.043]) and indirect (ab = 0.028, 95%CI [0.014, 0.043]) effects of intrinsic motivation on exercise, a fully mediated indirect effect of extrinsic motivation on exercise (ab = 0.027, 95%CI [0.011, 0.046]), and negative direct (c′ = −0.281, 95%CI [−0.368, −0.194]) and indirect (ab = −0.161, 95%CI [−0.221, −0.105]) effects of amotivation on exercise. There was no direct association between extrinsic motivation and exercise (c′ = 0.013, 95% CI [−0.013, 0.037]). In conclusion, trait self-control mediates motivation to influence exercise behaviour in older adults. Intrinsically motivated individuals resist sedentary living and show higher self-control, while extrinsically motivated ones rely on self-control and are more susceptible to non-adherence during mental fatigue. High amotivation is linked to less exercise and reduced self-control, suggesting potential non-compliance with structured exercise interventions.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health

Nikos Ntoumanis,Johan Y.Y. Ng,Andrew Prestwich,Eleanor Quested,Jennie E. Hancox,Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani,Edward L. Deci,Richard M. Ryan,Chris Lonsdale,Geoffrey C. Williams

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1718529

2020-02-03

Health Psychology Review

Abstract:There are no literature reviews that have examined the impact of health-domain interventions, informed by self-determination theory (SDT), on SDT constructs and health indices. Our aim was to meta-analyse such interventions in the health promotion and disease management literatures. Studies were eligible if they used an experimental design, tested an intervention that was based on SDT, measured at least one SDT-based motivational construct, and at least one indicator of health behaviour, physical health, or psychological health. Seventy-three studies met these criteria and provided sufficient data for the purposes of the review. A random-effects meta-analytic model showed that SDT-based interventions produced small-to-medium changes in most SDT constructs at the end of the intervention period, and in health behaviours at the end of the intervention period and at the follow-up. Small positive changes in physical and psychological health outcomes were also observed at the end of the interventions. Increases in need support and autonomous motivation (but not controlled motivation or amotivation) were associated with positive changes in health behaviour. In conclusion, SDT-informed interventions positively affect indices of health; these effects are modest, heterogeneous, and partly due to increases in self-determined motivation and support from social agents.

psychology, clinical
Beliefs about self-control

Jinyao Li,Marleen Gillebaart,Tim van Timmeren

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101898

Abstract:It is increasingly recognized that successful self-control is not only determined by sheer willpower, but also by people's beliefs about self-control. While early research has provided evidence that people's implicit theories can moderate their subsequent self-control performance, recent research considers the role of metacognition in self-control more comprehensively. In this review, we present an overview of recent advances in the field, emphasizing self-control beliefs and their potential impact on self-control outcomes. We also stress lay beliefs about self-control as an overlooked topic and promising avenue for future research.
A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety

Terrie E. Moffitt,Louise Arseneault,Daniel Belsky,Nigel Dickson,Robert J. Hancox,HonaLee Harrington,Renate Houts,Richie Poulton,Brent W. Roberts,Stephen Ross,Malcolm R. Sears,W. Murray Thomson,Avshalom Caspi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010076108

IF: 11.1

2011-01-24

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract:Policy-makers are considering large-scale programs aimed at self-control to improve citizens’ health and wealth and reduce crime. Experimental and economic studies suggest such programs could reap benefits. Yet, is self-control important for the health, wealth, and public safety of the population? Following a cohort of 1,000 children from birth to the age of 32 y, we show that childhood self-control predicts physical health, substance dependence, personal finances, and criminal offending outcomes, following a gradient of self-control. Effects of children's self-control could be disentangled from their intelligence and social class as well as from mistakes they made as adolescents. In another cohort of 500 sibling-pairs, the sibling with lower self-control had poorer outcomes, despite shared family background. Interventions addressing self-control might reduce a panoply of societal costs, save taxpayers money, and promote prosperity.
Perceived Control and Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Motivation for Oral Self-Care: A Full Factorial Experimental Test of Theory-Based Persuasive Messages

Liam Staunton,Paul Gellert,Keegan Knittle,Falko F. Sniehotta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-014-9655-2

2014-09-23

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Correlational evidence suggests that perceived control (PC) and intrinsic motivation (IM), key constructs in social cognitive and self-determination theories, may interact to reinforce behavior change.PURPOSE: This proof-of-principle study examines the independent and synergistic effects of interventions to increase PC and IM upon dental flossing frequency.METHODS: University students (n = 185) were randomized in a 2 × 2 full factorial design to receive two computer-based interventions: one to either increase or decrease PC and another to increase either IM or extrinsic motivation. These constructs were measured immediately post-intervention; flossing behavior was measured 1 week later.RESULTS: The interventions to increase PC and PC/IM had main and interaction effects on flossing, respectively. The PC/IM interaction effect was mediated by increases in PC and IM.CONCLUSIONS: Combining interventions to increase PC and IM seems to be a promising avenue of research, which has implications for both theory and intervention development.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Positive affect, self-access, and health

Markus Quirin,Julius Kuhl

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1026/0943-8149.16.3.139

2008-07-01

Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie

Abstract:Abstract. Based on the framework of Personality Systems Interactions theory, this article addresses the functional mechanisms by which positive affect influences motivational and self-regulatory determinants of health-relevant behavior on an elementary level of processing. Research encompassing experimental procedures such as the Stroop task will be presented which suggest that positive affect is necessary not only to facilitate self-regulation of negative emotions but also to facilitate self-motivation, i.e., the enactment of difficult intentions that entail the risk of procrastination. We also highlight the role of state and trait accessibility of self-referential information (”self-access”) in generating such positive affect. The relevance of the findings for health maintenance is addressed.

Analysis and Countermeasure on Vulnerability of WPA Key Exchange Mechanism

Consideration of Future Consequences and Self-Control Mediate the Impact of Time Perspectives on Self-Rated Health and Engagement in Healthy Lifestyles among Young Adults

Are trait self-control and self-control resources mediators of relations between executive functions and health behaviors?

More than resisting temptation: Beneficial habits mediate the relationship between self-control and positive life outcomes.

Psychological Determinants of Health Behavior

Social cognition, personality and social-political correlates of health behaviors: Application of an integrated theoretical model

A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Health Belief Model Variables in Predicting Behavior

The fable of state self-control

High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success.

Perceived behavioral control moderating effects in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis.

Motivational dynamics of self-control

Toward controlling of a pandemic: How self-control ability influences willingness to take the COVID-19 vaccine

Rethinking the Measurement of Self-Control: Distinguishing Among Self-Control Capacity, Urge Intensity, and Behavior Outcomes

Physical activity automaticity, intention, and trait self-control as predictors of physical activity behavior – a dual-process perspective

The role of executive functioning on the intention-behaviour relationship of health behaviours: a temporal self-regulatory perspective

It Is Not Just a Matter of Motivation: The Role of Self-Control in Promoting Physical Activity in Older Adults—A Bayesian Mediation Model

A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health

Beliefs about self-control

A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety

Perceived Control and Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Motivation for Oral Self-Care: A Full Factorial Experimental Test of Theory-Based Persuasive Messages

Positive affect, self-access, and health