Short‐latency afferent inhibition is reduced in people with multiple sclerosis during fatiguing muscle contractions

Emily J. Brotherton,Surendran Sabapathy,Lisa M. Dempsey,Justin J. Kavanagh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.16253
IF: 3.698
2024-01-19
European Journal of Neuroscience
Abstract:People with multiple sclerosis (MS) demonstrated significant reductions in short‐latency afferent inhibition (SAI) during a low‐intensity contraction protocol compared to the healthy controls. These findings show that afferent inhibition differs in people with MS, where intracortical circuits appear to disinhibit SAI during fatiguing contractions. These MS‐related SAI differences likely associated with disease‐related changes in central integration. Understanding how inhibitory pathways influence motor cortical activity during fatiguing contractions may provide valuable insight into mechanisms associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) muscle activation. Short‐latency afferent inhibition (SAI) reflects inhibitory interactions between the somatosensory cortex and the motor cortex, and although SAI is typically reduced with MS, it is unknown how SAI is regulated during exercise‐induced fatigue. The current study examined how SAI modulates motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during fatiguing contractions. Fourteen people with relapsing–remitting MS (39 ± 6 years, nine female) and 10 healthy individuals (36 ± 6 years, six female) participated. SAI was induced by stimulation of the median nerve that was paired with TMS over the motor representation of the abductor pollicis brevis. A contraction protocol was employed that depressed force generating capacity using a sustained 3‐min 15% MVC, immediately followed by a low‐intensity (15% MVC) intermittent contraction protocol so that MEP and SAI could be measured during the rest phases of each duty cycle. Similar force, electromyography and MEP responses were observed between groups. However, the MS group had significantly reduced SAI during the contraction protocol compared to the healthy control group (p
neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?