The effects of resistance training to near volitional failure on motor unit recruitment during neuromuscular fatigue
Jonathan P Beausejour,Kevan S Knowles,Jason I Pagan,Juan P Rodriguez,Daniel Sheldon,Bradley A Ruple,Daniel L Plotkin,Morgan A Smith,Joshua S Godwin,Casey L Sexton,Mason C McIntosh,Nicholas J Kontos,Cleiton A Libardi,Kaelin Young,Michael D Roberts,Matt S Stock
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18163
IF: 3.061
2024-10-14
PeerJ
Abstract:Background: It is unclear whether chronically training close to volitional failure influences motor unit recruitment strategies during fatigue. Purpose: We compared resistance training to near volitional failure vs. non-failure on individual motor unit action potential amplitude (MUAP) and surface electromyographic excitation (sEMG) during fatiguing contractions. Methods: Nineteen resistance-trained adults (11 males, 8 females) underwent 5 weeks (3×/week) of either low repetitions-in-reserve (RIR; 0-1 RIR) or high RIR training (4-6 RIR). Before and after the intervention, participants performed isometric contractions of the knee extensors at 30% of maximal peak torque until exhaustion while vastus lateralis sEMG signals were recorded and later decomposed. MUAP and sEMG excitation for the vastus lateralis were quantified at the beginning, middle, and end of the fatigue assessment. Results: Both training groups improved time-to-task failure (mean change = 43.3 s, 24.0%), with no significant differences between low and high RIR training groups (low RIR = 28.7%, high RIR = 19.4%). Our fatigue assessment revealed reduced isometric torque steadiness and increased MUAP amplitude and sEMG excitation during the fatiguing task, but these changes were consistent between groups. Conclusion: Both low and high RIR training improved time-to-task failure, but resulted in comparable motor unit recruitment during fatiguing contractions. Our findings indicate that both low and high RIR training can be used to enhance fatiguability among previously resistance-trained adults.