Abstract:In light of recent events involving dose to patients undergoing CT exams, many efforts to record patient dose have been initiated. Many national and international groups (FDA, NIBIB, ACR, IAEA, and NIH intramural programs) have called for recording “dose”, or required that CT equipment report dose. In California, a state law [SB1237] was recently passed that requires (as of July 1, 2012) the reporting of one of the following: “The computed tomography index volume (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP), as defined by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and recognized by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA); The dose unit as recommended by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine”. While these reporting/recording efforts are well‐meaning, the only dose metrics currently available for reporting are CTDIvol and DLP. While CTDIvol values are highly standardized and recognized around the world, they actually are measures of scanner output, and as such they do not reflect the actual patient dose or the irradiation burden of the exam . This misconception of CTDI is commonplace and has led to misinterpretation of the dosimetry values being reported at the scanner and recorded into patient records. The purpose of this symposium is to describe methods to more accurately estimate the radiation dose to various organs, and ultimately the radiation risk, to patients undergoing CT exams. The symposium covers methods aimed towards more patient‐specific estimates that take into account: (a) scanner related factors (CT manufacturer and model specifics), (b) exam related specifics (anatomic coverage, use of dose reduction methods such as tube current modulation) and (c) patient related factors such as age, gender, size, and shape. The learning objectives of this symposium include the following: 1. To understand the limitations of current metrics (e.g. CTDIvol) and methods in estimating patient dose 2. To understand the methods to more accurately estimate radiation dose that take into account scanner, exam and patient specific factors 3. To understand the role of Computational Phantoms and Monte Carlo simulation methods in developing patient‐specific organ dose estimates 4. To understand methods to estimate patient‐specific organ doses, effective doses, and radiation risk for comparison and optimization purposes

Implications of the ICRU 95 quantities for various personal dosimetry techniques

[Individual Irradiation Dose Trend and Correlation Analysis of Nuclear Medicine Workers in a Hospital].

Investigating the impact of new dosimetric quantities recommended by ICRU 95 on the OSLd individual monitoring system at OAP, Thailand

Internal Dosimetry: State of the Art and Research Needed

IPEM topical report: personal dose monitoring requirements in healthcare

PERSONAL DOSIMETRY USING MONTE-CARLO SIMULATIONS FOR OCCUPATIONAL DOSE MONITORING IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY: THE RESULTS OF A PROOF OF CONCEPT IN A CLINICAL SETTING

EURADOS intercomparison IC2020ph on whole body dosemeters for photons

Conversion Coefficients from Kerma to Ambient Dose and Personal Dose for X-Ray Spectra

Response of Photon Dosimeters and Survey Instruments to New Operational Quantities Proposed by ICRU RC26

Improving Calculations of Electron Eye-lens Operational Dose Coefficients Using the Monte Carlo Codes PENELOPE and MCNP6.2

An Italian InterLaboratory comparison on personal dose equivalent for dosimetry services: promoting measurements reliability and addressing new digital challenges

Bringing Light into Darkness—Comparison of Different Personal Dosimeters for Assessment of Solar Ultraviolet Exposure

TU‐C‐110‐01: Patient Dose in CT: Calculating Patient Specific Doses in CT(Joint with Education)

Occupational skin dose from radionuclide contamination: One country's approach at standardising skin dose estimates using Varskin+

Dose Conversion Coefficients Based on the Chinese Mathematical Phantom and MCNP Code for External Photon Irradiation

Monte Carlo dosimetry for a EURADOS WG 10 and RENEB field test of retrospective dosimetry techniques in realistic exposure scenarios

Dosimetric quantities and effective dose in medical imaging: a summary for medical doctors

Performance assessment and further optimization of the activation based criticality dosimetry system at the Belgian nuclear research centre SCK CEN

The effective dose equivalent and effective dose for hot particles on the skin

SU-GG-T-347: Methods to Calculate Organ Doses Due to Scattered Radiation From External Beam Radiation Treatment Using Various Patient Phantoms and Monte Carlo Simulations

Dose Calibration of Health Canada's Fixed Point Surveillance System for Environmental Radiation Monitoring in Terms of Air Kerma and H*(10)