Abstract:Background After tooth loss, alveolar bone atrophy and pneumatization of the maxillary sinus occur. It is difficult for implant placement to posterior maxilla because of the reduced residual bone height (RBH) available. Osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE) is a reliable technique and produced satisfied results. Compared with oral panoramic radiograph (OPG), the application of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) that provides clinically valuable information is considered to be more accurate assessment. Aim/Hypothesis The purpose of this study was to compare radiographically the variances of measurements on OPG and CBCT, and to evaluate the effects of endo-sinus new bone formation after OSFE without grafting in a short time. Simultaneously, to analysis the potential related factors of endo-sinus bone gain (ESBG). Material and Methods A prospective study design was adopted. 87 implant placements were inserted in 80 patients. OPG and CBCT were used at preoperative, immediately in postoperative period and before stage II surgery (mean 5-month postoperative). The RBH was measured at preoperative and before stage II surgery, the implant protrusion length (IPL) was assessed at immediately postoperative and before stage II surgery, ESBG was reviewed before stage II surgery. Compare the RBH, IPL, ESBG between two groups from OPG and CBCT. Correlation analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between ESBG with IPL, RBH, age, gender and bone block lifted intraoperatively by osteotomes. Significance was set to 0.05. Results The mean RBH was 8.47 ± 1.78 mm on OPG and 8.08 ± 1.47 mm on CBCT preoperatively. After mean 5 months, it was found the averaged RBH was 9.58 ± 1.67 mm on OPG and 10.59 ± 1.51 mm on CBCT. The mean IPL was 2.44 ± 1.16 mm on OPG and 1.98 ± 1.09 mm on CBCT at immediately postoperative. The averaged IPL was 1.27 ± 1.30 mm on OPG and 0.05 ± 1.33 mm on CBCT before the stage II surgery, respectively. ESBG was 1.10 ± 0.76 mm on OPG and 1.90 ± 1.38 mm on CBCT. And there were all significant differences between two groups (P < 0.05). As shown by the numerical value, ESBG with bone block lifted were more than with no bone block lifted, but P value > 0.05 that indicating the difference was again not statistically significant difference between two groups. The relevant factors analysis detected that the final ESBG was positively correlated to IPL at immediately postoperative. Meanwhile, no other variables were detected showed to be associated with the final ESBG, including RBH, age, gender and bone block lifted. Conclusion and Clinical Implications In conclusion, compared with the OPG of 2D image, the errors of measurement could be reduced and the results could be assessed more accurately on CBCT. Approximate 2 mm endo-sinus bone augment could be acquired, and the final ESBG was explored to be positively correlated to IPL measured at immediately postoperative. Bone block lifted intraoperatively by osteotomes does not increase the amount of endo-sinus bone formation.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of lateral sinus floor elevation with simultaneous hydrophilic implants placement: A retrospective study of 2–5 years

Repositioning of the Bone Window in Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation with Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Retrospective Radiographic Study.

Outcomes of 6.5-Mm Hydrophilic Implants and Long Implants Placed with Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Comparison.

Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation and Simultaneous Implant Placement Without Grafting by Two Radiographic Methods

Changes in Bone Graft Height and Influencing Factors after Sinus Floor Augmentation by Using the Lateral Window Approach: A Clinical Retrospective Study of 1 to 2 Years.

Survival Analysis of Implants Placed Simultaneously with Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in Severely Atrophic Maxilla: A 3- to 12-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

Clinical outcomes and risk factors analysis of dental implants inserted with lateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation: A 3‐ to 8‐year retrospective study

Influence of Lateral Windows with Decreased Vertical Height Following Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: A 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Study.

Clinical and radiographic performance of late placed and early loaded dental implants with a conditioned hydrophilic surface in posterior mandible sites: A prospective case series with an 8.5‐ to 9.5‐year follow‐up

Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in Patients with Sinus Floor Defects: A Retrospective Study with a 1-to 9-Year Follow-Up

The Comparative Evaluation of Transcrestal and Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in Sites with Residual Bone Height ≤6 Mm: A Two-Year Prospective Randomized Study.

Follow-up study of implants with turned or oxidized surfaces placed after sinus augmentation

Minimally invasive techniques for lateral maxillary sinus floor elevation: small lateral window and one-stage surgery-a 2-5-year retrospective study

Long‐Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Hydrophilic Implants: A 10‐Year Study in a Specialist Private Practice

Sinus Floor Elevation and Simultaneous Dental Implantation: A Long Term Retrospective Study of Sinus Bone Gain

Osteotome sinus floor elevation with or without grafting: a preliminary clinical trial.

Stability of Grafted Implant Placement Sites After Sinus Floor Elevation Using a Layering Technique: 10-Year Clinical and Radiographic Results

Osteotome sinus floor elevation with or without grafting: a 3-year randomized controlled clinical trial.

Flapless osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation using platelet-rich fibrin versus lateral approach using deproteinised bovine bone mineral for residual bone height of 2-6 mm: A randomised trial

Short Versus Longer Implants with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation for Moderately Atrophic Posterior Maxillae: A 1-Year Randomized Clinical Trial.

Histological, radiological, and clinical outcomes of sinus floor elevation using a lateral approach for pre-/post-extraction of the severely compromised maxillary molars: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial