Abstract:OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, Ahead of Print. Life and death education is a distinct field of study that has potential life relevance for consideration (e.g., self-awareness and subsequent improvement of one's own health well-being). Existing research development, situating in different learning-sociocultural contexts, has provided consistent evidence that showcases the differing viewpoints of life functioning (e.g., what is the true meaning of life?) and the intricate nature of death and dying (e.g., a death ritual that closely associates with a particular cultural group). Some of the research studies undertaken indicate the effective use of 'philosophization' or the discourse of philosophical analysis, enabling individuals to philosophize, contemplate, and seek transpersonal understanding of the subject matters of life and death (e.g., can a state of 'spiritual transcendence' help to alleviate a person's fear of death?). Such discourse, interestingly, has offered some informative yields for enriching and meaningful life purposes – for example, the seeking to attain transpersonal understanding of life (e.g., what does a state of self-transcendence actually mean?) and/or transpersonal life experience may assist a senior citizen to cope with his mental health during a temporary health crisis. Our teaching and research interest of life and death education over the past decade has led us to consider one important line of inquiry for development: namely, the proposition of a 'universal' blueprint or framework of life and death education for curriculum development, teaching, and research purposes. We are cognizant of the fact that, to date, there is no clear consensus or agreement as to what one is expected (e.g., specific learning outcome) to teach students who wish to study and learn about life and death education. On this basis, the present theoretical article introduces a theoretical framework, termed as 'The Life + Death Education Framework' (e.g., for universities), to assist educators for their quality teaching and/or research inquiries of life and death education. We firmly believe that the Life + Death Education Framework can be universal and, in this case, apply to different learning-sociocultural contexts.

The Framework for Life Span Family Life Education Revisited and Revised

Family Health Development: A Theoretical Framework.

The Enlightenment Of Sfbc To Family Education In China During Social Transition

Updated Framework for School Nurse Self-Reflection and Evaluation

Development of a Conceptual Framework for Adult Community Rehabilitation Policy, Planning, Care, and Research: A Multimethod Qualitative Approach

The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback

Aging and Family Life: A Decade Review

Themes and Theories Revisited: Perspectives on Processes in Family–Peer Relationships

Move towards a New Balanced Learning:Analysis of "the 21st Century Learning Framework"

The Life + Death Education Framework: Proposition of a 'Universal' Framework for Implementation

Subjective age: Toward a guiding lifespan framework

Building a Life Course Intervention Research Framework.

Revising McPhail’s Feminist Policy Analysis Framework

Families in Later Life: A Decade in Review

Families With Children and Adolescents: A Review, Critique, and Future Agenda

From the third age to the third sex: A feminist framework for the life course

Nursing educational framework: A new nurse-driven, conceptually guided approach

Continuity and Change in the Family System Across the Transition from Adolescence to Emerging Adulthood

Family psychology: Past and future reflections on the field.

Bowen family systems theory and practice: Illustration and critique revisited

Adopting a Life-Span Perspective on the First School Transition