CPC13 BRAF mutated and morphologically Spitz naevi and tumours: a series of four cases

Maged Daruish,Helen Goodyear,Julie Lemahieu,Saleem Taibjee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae090.026
IF: 11.113
2024-06-28
British Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:Abstract The current World Health Organization classification of skin tumours (5th edition) indicates that melanocytic tumours of the Spitz pathway can be defined by mutually exclusive oncogenic drivers, including HRAS-activating mutations or kinase fusions. Accordingly, the term ‘spitzoid’ has been suggested for tumours that show morphological features of Spitz tumours but lack these defining molecular aberrations. Such neoplasms harbouring BRAF or NRAS mutations include a subtype of melanomas with confirmed risk of local recurrence and metastasis. In contrast, a recent study described a subset of Spitz-looking neoplasms with BRAF mutations and insufficient criteria for melanoma (Zhao J, Benton S, Zhang B et al. Benign and intermediate-grade melanocytic tumours with BRAF mutations and Spitzoid morphology. Am J Surg Pathol 2022; 46: 476–85). The term BRAF mutated and morphologically spitzoid naevi/tumours (BAMS) was proposed for such lesions. We present a series of four cases of BAMS. The patients ranged in age from 3 to 40 years; three were male and one was female. The clinical history varied from new growing moles to change within long-standing lesions, congenital in one instance. One lesion was submitted with the query of halo naevus. Anatomical sites included the abdomen, pubis, right buttock and left upper back. In one of our cases the clinical appearance, including starburst pattern on dermoscopy, was very suggestive of a pigmented Spitz naevus. All cases showed a predominantly epithelioid cytomorphology with accompanying melanophages. The cytoplasmic pigment was prominent in three cases. Three of the neoplasms were compound, with evidence of maturation with depth. The case described clinically as a changing congenital lesion had a mild degree of cytological atypia, a single superficial mitosis and focal PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma positivity. In this case there was bridging of nests and lamellar fibroplasia, indicating overlapping features with Clark dysplastic naevus. Three cases had Kamino bodies. Immunostaining for BRAF V600E was positive in all cases. Overall, the histological findings in our cohort are in concordance with those reported by Zhao et al. Interestingly, BRAF mutations were also identified in another study of ‘Spitz naevi’, likely representing BAMS (Fullen DR, Poynter JN, Lowe L et al. BRAF and NRAS mutations in spitzoid melanocytic lesions. Mod Pathol 2006; 19: 1324–32). Further studies are necessary to characterize the BAMS group, including long-term follow-up. Recognition of this group of tumours is important to avoid melanoma overdiagnosis in the advent of ancillary immunohistochemistry and molecular testing in determining melanocytic lineage in day-to-day practice.
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?