Defining the spatial landscape of KRAS mutated congenital pulmonary airway malformations: a distinct entity with a spectrum of histopathologic features

Nya D. Nelson,Feng Xu,Prashant Chandrasekaran,Leslie A. Litzky,William H. Peranteau,David B. Frank,Marilyn Li,Jennifer Pogoriler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-022-01129-0
IF: 8.209
2022-01-01
Modern Pathology
Abstract:The potential pathogenetic mechanisms underlying the varied morphology of congenital pulmonary airway malformations (CPAMs) have not been molecularly determined, but a subset have been shown to contain clusters of mucinous cells (MCC). These clusters are believed to serve as precursors for potential invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma, and they are associated with KRAS codon 12 mutations. To assess the universality of KRAS mutations in MCCs, we sequenced exon 2 of KRAS in 61 MCCs from 18 patients, and we found a KRAS codon 12 mutation in all 61 MCCs. Furthermore, all MCCs from a single patient always had the same KRAS mutation, and the same KRAS mutation was also found in non-mucinous lesional tissue. Next generation sequencing of seven MCCs showed no other mutations or copy number variations. Sequencing of 46 additional CPAMs with MCCs revealed KRAS mutations in non-mucinous lesional tissue in all cases. RNA in situ hybridization confirmed widespread distribution of cells with mutant KRAS RNA, even extending outside of the bronchiolar type epithelium. We identified 25 additional CPAMs with overall histologic architecture similar to CPAMs with KRAS mutations but without identifiable MCCs, and we found KRAS mutations in 17 (68%). The histologic features of these KRAS mutated CPAMs included type 1 and type 3 morphology, as well as lesions with an intermediate histologic appearance, and analysis revealed a strong correlation between the specific amino acid substitution and histomorphology. These findings, together with previously published model organism data, suggests that the formation of type 1 and 3 CPAMs is driven by mosaic KRAS mutations arising in the lung epithelium early in development and places them within the growing field of mosaic RASopathies. The presence of widespread epithelial mutation explains late metastatic disease in incompletely resected patients and reinforces the recommendation for complete resection of these lesions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?