Sex differences in severe aortic stenosis undergoing surgical replacement
G Panichella,M Garofalo,F Bonanni,A Grasso Granchietti,M Berteotti,V Tozzetti,N Cenni,M Bandini,C Servoli,G Grandi,S Del Pace,S Caciolli
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.3097
IF: 39.3
2024-10-30
European Heart Journal
Abstract:Background Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease in developed countries. Sex differences have been described in AS pathophysiology and left ventricular (LV) remodelling, as well as clinical presentation and response to therapies (1). However, sex differences in LV function parameters, namely global longitudinal strain (GLS), have been scarcely explored so far. Purpose To investigate sex differences, taking into account GLS, in patients with severe AS referred to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Methods The study population was from a single centre, prospective registry of patients with severe native valve AS who were referred for SAVR between June 2020 to October 2022. Severe AS was defined by standard guideline criteria (2). All patients underwent an echocardiogram immediately before and at least 3 months after surgery. Results Table 1 recapitulates sex differences in our population (n=119, 43% women). No differences in age or cardiovascular (CV) risk factors were noted. Clinical presentation and AS etiology were also similar. At baseline, women had lower EuroSCORE (p=0.039), creatinine (p <0.001), and haemoglobin levels (p=0.001). The echocardiogram showed a higher mean aortic valve gradient in women (Gmean, 62 vs. 50 mmHg, p=0.002). Women also had higher relative wall thickness (RWT, 0.49 vs. 0.42, p=0.037), despite lower LV mass index (124.9 vs. 136.6 g/m2, p=0.037). Regarding LV function, women showed higher EF (64% vs. 60%, p=0.002) and GLS (16.5% vs. 14.6%, p=0.006) values. This is partially explained by the higher prevalence of concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) in men, more frequently subjected to a concomitant coronary artery bypass graft than women (CABG, 38% vs. 8%, p <0.001). Post-operative complications had similar rates in men and women. After a median follow-up of 16 (6-18) months, death from any cause (6.0% vs. 1.5%, p=0.186) and rehospitalization for CV causes (14.0% vs. 4.0%, p=0.055) tended to be more frequent among women. When considering patients with severe AS alone (n=89), women had higher Gmean (64 vs. 53 mmHg, p=0.035) and EF (65% vs. 62%, p=0.045) but similar GLS (16.9% vs. 16.6%, p=0.230) as compared to men (Figure 2). At follow-up, EF and GLS failed to improve in both sexes and no differences were noted between women and men (EF 60% vs. 60%, p=0.476; GLS 15.9% vs. 16.0%, p=0.976). Conclusions In a population of all-comers patients with severe AS undergoing SAVR, women showed higher Gmean, EF, and GLS values. This is partially due to the higher prevalence of a concomitant CAD in men. When considering patients with AS alone, women still had higher EF and Gmean than men, despite a similar GLS. Future larger prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed in order to further characterize such differences and correlate them with specific outcomes.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems