Contingency Management plus Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Initial Cocaine Abstinence: Results of a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART)

Joy M. Schmitz,Angela L. Stotts,Anka A. Vujanovic,Jin H. Yoon,Heather E. Webber,Scott D. Lane,Michael F. Weaver,Jessica Vincent,Robert Suchting,Charles E. Green
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.111078
IF: 4.852
2024-01-06
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Abstract:Background This study tested an adaptive intervention for optimizing abstinence outcomes over phases of treatment for cocaine use disorder using a SMART design. Phase 1 assessed whether 4 weeks of contingency management (CM) improved response with the addition of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). Phase 2 assessed pharmacological augmentation with modafinil (MOD) vs. placebo (PLA) for individuals not achieving abstinence during Phase 1. Method For Phase 1 of treatment, participants ( N =118) were randomly allocated to ACT+CM or Drug Counseling (DC+CM), the comparison condition. At week 4, treatment response was defined as the submission of six consecutive cocaine-negative urine drug screens (UDS). Phase 1 non-responders were re-randomized to MOD or PLA as adjunct to their initial treatment. Phase 1 responders continued receiving their initial treatment. Primary outcomes included response rate and proportion of cocaine-negative UDS for Phase 1 and 2. Analyses used Bayesian inference with 80% pre-specified as the posterior probability (PP) threshold constituting moderate evidence that an effect exists. Results Phase 1 response was higher in the ACT+CM group (24.5%) compared to the DC+CM group (17.5%; PP = 84.5%). In Phase 2, the proportion of cocaine-negative UDS among Phase 1 responders did not differ by initial treatment (PP = 61.8%) but remained higher overall compared to Phase 1 non-responders (PPs > 99%). No evidence of an effect favoring augmentation with MOD was observed. Discussion Adding ACT to CM increased abstinence initiation. Initial responders were more likely to remain abstinent compared to initial non-responders, for whom modafinil was not an effective pharmacotherapy augmentation strategy.
psychiatry,substance abuse
What problem does this paper attempt to address?