Abstract:Some episodes of learning are easier than others. Preschoolers can learn certain facts, such as "my grandmother gave me this purse," only after one or two exposures (easy to learn; fast mapping), but they require several years to learn that plants are alive or that the sun is not alive (hard to learn). One difference between the two kinds of knowledge acquisition is that hard cases often require conceptual construction, such as the construction of the biological concept alive, whereas easy cases merely involve forming new beliefs formulated over concepts the child already has (belief revision, a form of knowledge enrichment). We asked whether different domain-general cognitive resources support these two types of knowledge acquisition (conceptual construction and knowledge enrichment that supports fast mapping) by testing 82 6-year-olds in a pre-training/training/post-training study. We measured children's improvement in an episode involving theory construction (the beginning steps of acquisition of the framework theory of vitalist biology, which requires conceptual change) and in an episode involving knowledge enrichment alone (acquisition of little known facts about animals, such as the location of crickets' ears and the color of octopus blood). In addition, we measured children's executive functions and receptive vocabulary to directly compare the resources drawn upon in the two episodes of learning. We replicated and extended previous findings highlighting the differences between conceptual construction and knowledge enrichment, and we found that Executive Functions predict improvement on the Vitalism battery but not on the Fun Facts battery and that Receptive Vocabulary predicts improvement the Fun Facts battery but not on the Vitalism battery. This double dissociation provides new evidence for the distinction between the two types of knowledge acquisition, and bears on the nature of the learning mechanisms involved in each.

Generative and active engagement in learning neuroscience: A comparison of self-derivation and rephrase

Effects of Explaining a Science Lesson to Others or to Oneself: A Cognitive Neuroscience Approach

Self-derivation through memory integration: a longitudinal examination of performance and relations with academic achievements in elementary classrooms

The neuroscience of active learning and direct instruction

Generative learning supports learning from video lectures: evidence from an EEG study

Eight Ways to Promote Generative Learning

Integrating Generative AI in Active Learning Environments: Enhancing Metacognition and Technological Skills

Generative Learning Processes of the Brain

A Neuro-mimetic Realization of the Common Model of Cognition via Hebbian Learning and Free Energy Minimization

Learning as a Generative Activity

Toward a neural basis for peer-interaction: what makes peer-learning tick?

Fostering generative learning from video lessons: Benefits of instructor-generated drawings and learner-generated explanations.

Modifying AI, Enhancing Essays: How Active Engagement with Generative AI Boosts Writing Quality

The relationship between student interaction with generative artificial intelligence and learning achievement: serial mediating roles of self-efficacy and cognitive engagement

Generating Distant Analogies Facilitates Relational Integration: Intermediary Role of Relational Mindset and Cognitive Load

How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement.

Evaluating the Judgment of Learning: its Limited Impact and the Power of Retrieval on Inductive Learning

The role of domain-general cognitive resources in children's construction of a vitalist theory of biology

Which forms of active learning are most effective: Cooperative learning, writing-to-learn, multimedia instruction, or some combination?

Why do learners who draw perform well? Investigating the role of visualization, generation and externalization in learner-generated drawing

An Evolutionary Approach to Motivation and Learning: Differentiating Biologically Primary and Secondary Knowledge