An Evolutionary Approach to Motivation and Learning: Differentiating Biologically Primary and Secondary Knowledge

Xu, Kate M.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09880-3

IF: 8.24

2024-04-19

Educational Psychology Review

Abstract:The ubiquity of formal education in modern nations is often accompanied by an assumption that students' motivation for learning is innate and self-sustaining. The latter is true for most children in domains (e.g., language) that are universal and have a deep evolutionary history, but this does not extend to learning in evolutionarily novel domains (e.g., mathematics). Learning in evolutionarily novel domains requires more cognitive effort and thus is less motivating. The current study tested the associated hypothesis that learning will feel easier and more motivating for evolutionarily relevant (e.g., "mother," "food") than evolutionarily novel (e.g., "computer," "gravity") word pairs and that a growth mindset emphasizing the importance of effort in learning might moderate this effect. Specifically, 144 adults were presented with 32 word pairs (half evolutionarily relevant and half evolutionarily novel) and were randomly assigned to a growth mindset or a control condition. Evolutionarily relevant words were better remembered than evolutionarily novel words ( d = 0.65), and the learning was reported as more enjoyable ( d = 0.49), more interesting ( d = 0.38), as well as less difficult ( d = − 0.96) and effortful ( d = − 0.78). Although the growth mindset intervention fostered a mindset belief, compared to the control condition, it did not lead to improved recall performance or changes in motivational beliefs. These results are consistent with the prediction of higher motivation and better learning of evolutionarily relevant words and concepts than for evolutionarily novel words and concepts. Implications for future research and educational practice are discussed.

psychology, educational

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### The Problem This Paper Attempts to Solve

This paper aims to explore the impact of different types of evolutionary knowledge on learning motivation and outcomes. Specifically, the researchers tested the following hypotheses:

1. **Evolutionarily relevant vocabulary (e.g., "mother," "food") is easier to learn and more motivating than evolutionarily novel vocabulary (e.g., "computer," "gravity")**. Evolutionarily relevant vocabulary refers to words closely related to human survival and development, while evolutionarily novel vocabulary refers to words that are relatively new in the evolutionary process and less directly related to survival.
2. **Whether a growth mindset that emphasizes the importance of effort can moderate this effect**. The researchers aimed to see if introducing a growth mindset intervention could improve learning performance and motivation.

### Research Background

In modern education systems, it is generally believed that students' learning motivation is innate and self-sustaining. However, this view does not apply to all learning domains. For areas with a deep evolutionary history (e.g., language), most children indeed show strong intrinsic motivation. But for evolutionarily newer domains (e.g., mathematics), learning requires more cognitive effort, and thus motivation is lower. The researchers aimed to test this hypothesis through experiments and explore the effects of growth mindset interventions.

### Experimental Design

- **Participants**: 144 adult psychology undergraduates.
- **Experimental Conditions**: Participants were randomly assigned to either a growth mindset intervention group or a control group and learned 32 pairs of words (half of which were evolutionarily relevant vocabulary and the other half evolutionarily novel vocabulary).
- **Measurement Indicators**: Included memory accuracy, learning interest, learning enjoyment, perceived difficulty, and effort level.

### Main Findings

- **Evolutionarily Relevant Vocabulary**: Participants had better memory for evolutionarily relevant vocabulary (d = 0.65), found the learning process more interesting (d = 0.38), more enjoyable (d = 0.49), and perceived it as less difficult (d = -0.96) and less effortful (d = -0.78).
- **Growth Mindset Intervention**: Although the growth mindset intervention successfully cultivated growth mindset beliefs, it did not significantly improve recall performance or change motivational beliefs.

### Conclusion

The findings support the hypothesis that evolutionarily relevant vocabulary is easier to learn and more motivating than evolutionarily novel vocabulary. However, the growth mindset intervention did not show significant differences in learning and motivation for these two types of vocabulary. These findings have important implications for future educational practices and research.