Explaining the slow progress of coal phase-out: The case of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Region

Peng Wang,Muyi Yang,Kristy Mamaril,Xunpeng Shi,Beibei Cheng,Daiqing Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112331
IF: 9
2021-08-01
Energy Policy
Abstract:<p>Prompted by the urgency of climate change, this paper analyses the impediments for coal phase-out, by using the Greater Bay Region in China as a case study. Rather than factors specific to coal production, transport and consumption (<em>e.g.,</em> subsidies, and vested interests), as suggested by existing literature, the analysis of this paper demonstrates that coal phase-out in the region has encountered a range of market (<em>e.g.,</em> high gas price), infrastructure (such as, inadequate network), and regulatory (<em>e.g.,</em> prolonged project approval) impediments; these impediments have hindered the effective deployment of alternative energy sources, raising concern about coal phase-out and its crippling impacts on the security of energy supply. Redressing these impediments is therefore a key priority for promoting a smooth coal phase-out in the region. This requires a mix of policies addressing two dimensions: 1) those aimed at squeezing out coal from the energy-mix to create room for alternative low-carbon energy sources; and 2) those aimed at supporting the uptake of these sources. Implementing these policies is however a challenging task as it relies on close-centre-local, and inter- and intra-regional cooperation, especially in a resource-poor region with a disperse energy endowment. Achieving this is difficult because the energy policy process of the country has long been characterised by fragmented authority and territorial administrative divisions with a proclivity for local governments to work in isolation from each other.</p>
economics,environmental studies,energy & fuels,environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?