Lia I Losonczy,Alfred Papali,Sean Kivlehan,Emilie J Calvello Hynes,Georgina Calderon,Adam Laytin,Vanessa Moll,Ahmed Al Hazmi,Mohammed Alsabri,Diptesh Aryal,Vincent Atua,Torben Becker,Nicole Benzoni,Enrico Dippenaar,Edrist Duneant,Biruk Girma,Naomi George,Preeti Gupta,Michael Jaung,Bonaventure Hollong,Diulu Kabongo,Rebecca J Kruisselbrink,Dennis Lee,Augusto Maldonado,Jesse May,Maxwell Osei-Ampofo,Yasein Omer Osman,Christian Owoo,Shada A Rouhani,Hendry Sawe,Daniel Schnorr,Gentle S Shrestha,Aparajita Sohoni,Menbeu Sultan,Andrea G Tenner,Hanan Yusuf,Neill K Adhikari,Srinvas Murthy,Niranjan Kissoon,John Marshall,Abdo Khoury,Abdelouahab Bellou,Lee Wallis,Teri Reynolds

Abstract:This White Paper has been formally accepted for support by the International Federation for Emergency Medicine (IFEM) and by the World Federation of Intensive and Critical Care (WFICC), put forth by a multi-specialty group of intensivists and emergency medicine providers from low- and low-middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HiCs) with the aim of 1) defining the current state of caring for the critically ill in low-resource settings (LRS) within LMICs and 2) highlighting policy options and recommendations for improving the system-level delivery of early critical care services in LRS. LMICs have a high burden of critical illness and worse patient outcomes than HICs, hence, the focus of this White Paper is on the care of critically ill patients in the early stages of presentation in LMIC settings. In such settings, the provision of early critical care is challenged by a fragmented health system, costs, a health care workforce with limited training, and competing healthcare priorities. Early critical care services are defined as the early interventions that support vital organ function during the initial care provided to the critically ill patient-these interventions can be performed at any point of patient contact and can be delivered across diverse settings in the healthcare system and do not necessitate specialty personnel. Currently, a single "best" care delivery model likely does not exist in LMICs given the heterogeneity in local context; therefore, objective comparisons of quality, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness between varying models are difficult to establish. While limited, there is data to suggest that caring for the critically ill may be cost effective in LMICs, contrary to a widely held belief. Drawing from locally available resources and context, strengthening early critical care services in LRS will require a multi-faceted approach, including three core pillars: education, research, and policy. Education initiatives for physicians, nurses, and allied health staff that focus on protocolized emergency response training can bridge the workforce gap in the short-term; however, each country's current human resources must be evaluated to decide on the duration of training, who should be trained, and using what curriculum. Understanding the burden of critical Illness, best practices for resuscitation, and appropriate quality metrics for different early critical care services implementation models in LMICs are reliant upon strengthening the regional research capacity, therefore, standard documentation systems should be implemented to allow for registry use and quality improvement. Policy efforts at a local, national and international level to strengthen early critical care services should focus on funding the building blocks of early critical care services systems and promoting the right to access early critical care regardless of the patient's geographic or financial barriers. Additionally, national and local policies describing ethical dilemmas involving the withdrawal of life-sustaining care should be developed with broad stakeholder representation based on local cultural beliefs as well as the optimization of limited resources.

Interventions for improving critical care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Hospital-Based Quality Improvement Interventions for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Study Protocol: Impact of Quality Improvement Interventions on Perinatal Outcomes in Health Facilities—a Systematic Review

Improving quality of non-communicable disease services at primary care facilities in middle-income countries: A scoping review

Barriers and enablers of quality high-acuity neonatal care in sub-Saharan Africa: protocol for a synthesis of qualitative evidence

Improving the quality of neonatal health care in Ethiopia: a systematic review

Quality improvement in public–private partnerships in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

A health systems approach to critical care delivery in low-resource settings: a narrative review

Assessing quality of critical care during an ongoing health emergency—a novel approach to evaluate quality of care at Lebanese public ICUs during COVID-19

Critical care practices in the world: Results of the global intensive care unit need assessment survey 2020

Interventions to enhance the use of Evidence Based Decision Making for Quality Care among Nurses: A Systematic Review

Economic evaluation of quality improvement interventions to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in the hospital setting: a systematic review

Practical quality improvement changes for a low-resourced pediatric unit

Interventions on informal healthcare providers to improve the delivery of healthcare services in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Service delivery interventions to improve maternal and newborn health in low- and middle-income countries: scoping review of quality improvement, implementation research and health system strengthening approaches

Interventions to promote cost-effectiveness in adult intensive care units: consensus statement and considerations for best practice from a multidisciplinary and multinational eDelphi study

Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review

Perioperative Care Pathways in Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

White Paper on Early Critical Care Services in Low Resource Settings

Decreasing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections Rates in Intensive Care Units in 30 Low- and Middle-Income Countries: an INICC Approach.

Challenges and Strategies in Pediatric Critical Care: Insights From Low-Resource Settings