Abstract:Abstract Background Quality improvement collaboratives are widely used to improve health care in both high-income and low and middle-income settings. Teams from multiple health facilities share learning on a given topic and apply a structured cycle of change testing. Previous systematic reviews reported positive effects on target outcomes, but the role of context and mechanism of change is underexplored. This realist-inspired systematic review aims to analyse contextual factors influencing intended outcomes and to identify how quality improvement collaboratives may result in improved adherence to evidence-based practices. Methods We built an initial conceptual framework to drive our enquiry, focusing on three context domains: health facility setting; project-specific factors; wider organisational and external factors; and two further domains pertaining to mechanisms: intra-organisational and inter-organisational changes. We systematically searched five databases and grey literature for publications relating to quality improvement collaboratives in a healthcare setting and containing data on context or mechanisms. We analysed and reported findings thematically and refined the programme theory. Results We screened 962 abstracts of which 88 met the inclusion criteria, and we retained 32 for analysis. Adequacy and appropriateness of external support, functionality of quality improvement teams, leadership characteristics and alignment with national systems and priorities may influence outcomes of quality improvement collaboratives, but the strength and quality of the evidence is weak. Participation in quality improvement collaborative activities may improve health professionals’ knowledge, problem-solving skills and attitude; teamwork; shared leadership and habits for improvement. Interaction across quality improvement teams may generate normative pressure and opportunities for capacity building and peer recognition. Conclusion Our review offers a novel programme theory to unpack the complexity of quality improvement collaboratives by exploring the relationship between context, mechanisms and outcomes. There remains a need for greater use of behaviour change and organisational psychology theory to improve design, adaptation and evaluation of the collaborative quality improvement approach and to test its effectiveness. Further research is needed to determine whether certain contextual factors related to capacity should be a precondition to the quality improvement collaborative approach and to test the emerging programme theory using rigorous research designs.

Quality improvement in public–private partnerships in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Interventions for improving critical care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Public-Private Partnership Policy in Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review

Learning from the End of the Public-Private Partnership for Lesotho's National Referral Hospital Network

Improving quality of non-communicable disease services at primary care facilities in middle-income countries: A scoping review

Opportunities and challenges in public–private partnerships to reduce social inequality in health in upper-middle-income and high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-synthesis

How and under what circumstances do quality improvement collaboratives lead to better outcomes? A systematic review

Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review

Obstacles to implementation of an intervention to improve surgical services in an Ethiopian hospital: a qualitative study of an international health partnership project

Results of a Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Partnerships for Health: A Quality Improvement Initiative for Diabetes Care

Impact of health system governance on healthcare quality in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review

Systematic review of health data quality management and best practices at community and district levels in LMIC

Study Protocol: Impact of Quality Improvement Interventions on Perinatal Outcomes in Health Facilities—a Systematic Review

Implementing a nationwide quality improvement approach in health services

A systematic review of the effectiveness of strategies to improve health care provider performance in low- and middle-income countries: Methods and descriptive results

Hospital-Based Pediatric Quality Improvement Interventions and Health Disparities: A Scoping Review of the Literature

The effectiveness of continuous quality improvement for developing professional practice and improving health care outcomes: a systematic review

Barriers and Challenges to Implementing a Quality Improvement Program: Political and Administrative Challenges

Integration of IPC/WASH critical conditions into quality of care and quality improvement tools and processes: Bangladesh case study

‘Two heads are better than one.’ – exploring the experiences of Ghanaian communities on the role and effect of Patient-Public Engagement in Health System Improvement

Experiences in Improving the Quality of Community-Based Fever Management from Three Malaria-Endemic African Countries