Abstract:BACKGROUND:Only one in five American meets the physical activity recommendations of the Department of Health and Human Services. The proliferation of wearable devices and smartphones for physical activity tracking has led to an increasing number of interventions designed to facilitate regular physical activity, in particular to address the obesity epidemic, but also for cardiovascular disease patients, cancer survivors, and older adults. However, the inconsistent findings pertaining to the accuracy of wearable devices for step counting needs to be addressed, as well as factors known to affect gait (and thus potentially impact accuracy) such as age, body mass index (BMI), or leading arm.OBJECTIVE:We aim to assess the accuracy of recent mobile devices for counting steps, across three different age groups.METHODS:We recruited 60 participants in three age groups: 18-39 years, 40-64 years, and 65-84 years, who completed two separate 1000 step walks on a treadmill at a self-selected speed between 2 and 3 miles per hour. We tested two smartphones attached on each side of the waist, and five wrist-based devices worn on both wrists (2 devices on one wrist and 3 devices on the other), as well as the Actigraph wGT3X-BT, and swapped sides between each walk. All devices were swapped dominant-to-nondominant side and vice-versa between the two 1000 step walks. The number of steps was recorded with a tally counter. Age, sex, height, weight, and dominant hand were self-reported by each participant.RESULTS:Among the 60 participants, 36 were female (60%) and 54 were right-handed (90%). Median age was 53 years (min=19, max=83), median BMI was 24.1 (min=18.4, max=39.6). There was no significant difference in left- and right-hand step counts by device. Our analyses show that the Fitbit Surge significantly undercounted steps across all age groups. Samsung Gear S2 significantly undercounted steps only for participants among the 40-64 year age group. Finally, the Nexus 6P significantly undercounted steps for the group ranging from 65-84 years.CONCLUSIONS:Our analysis shows that apart from the Fitbit Surge, most of the recent mobile devices we tested do not overcount or undercount steps in the 18-39-year-old age group, however some devices undercount steps in older age groups. This finding suggests that accuracy in step counting may be an issue with some popular wearable devices, and that age may be a factor in undercounting. These results are particularly important for clinical interventions using such devices and other activity trackers, in particular to balance energy requirements with energy expenditure in the context of a weight loss intervention program.

Convergent Validity of Garmin Vivofit Jr. 3 and Fitbit Ace 3 for Monitoring Daily Physical Activity of Children

Validity of activity wristbands for estimating daily physical activity in primary schoolchildren under free-living conditions: School-Fit study

Validity of Wrist-Wearable Activity Devices for Estimating Physical Activity in Adolescents: Comparative Study

Validity of Wrist-Wearable Activity Devices for Estimating Physical Activity in Adolescents: Comparative Study (Preprint)

Physical Activity Assessment with the ActiGraph GT3X and Doubly Labeled Water

Comparison of stepping-based metrics from ActiGraph accelerometers worn concurrently on the non-dominant wrist and waist among young adults

Exploring the Association Between Self-Reported Asthma Impact and Fitbit-Derived Sleep Quality and Physical Activity Measures in Adolescents

Calibration and Cross-Validation of Accelerometery for Estimating Movement Skills in Children Aged 8–12 Years

Examining Accelerometer Validity for Estimating Physical Activity in Pre‐schoolers During Free‐living Activity

Validation of Fitbit-Flex as a measure of free-living physical activity in a community-based phase III cardiac rehabilitation population

Validating the Fitbit charge 4© wearable activity monitor for use in physical activity interventions

Evaluation of the Garmin Vivofit 4 for assessing sleep in youth experiencing sleep disturbances

Validation of the Apple Watch for Estimating Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity and Activity Energy Expenditure in School-Aged Children

Validation of two accelerometers to determine mechanical loading of physical activities in children

Comparison of ActiGraph GT9X Link with two Japanese accelerometers for assessments of free-living physical activity in junior high school students

Fitbit's accuracy to measure short bouts of stepping and sedentary behaviour: validation, sensitivity and specificity study

Convergent Validity of Four Accelerometer Cutpoints With Direct Observation of Preschool Children's Outdoor Physical Activity

Mobile Device Accuracy for Step Counting Across Age Groups.

Validity of Activity Tracker Step Counts during Walking, Running, and Activities of Daily Living

Current agreement between ActiGraph and CUPAR in measuring moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity for adolescents