Efficacy of Activity Trackers in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Benjamin Kogelschatz,Brittany A Penn,Ashlynn J Leavitt,Elizabeth Dranow,Christy L Ma,John J Ryan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.65117
2024-07-22
Cureus
Abstract:Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a common, complex syndrome associated with elevated morbidity and mortality. Patients with HFpEF have a high prevalence of comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and obesity, which are closely related to the underlying mechanisms of the disease. Lifestyle modification with weight loss and physical activity can improve risk factors and functional outcomes in HFpEF. We sought to observe daily physical activity and determine whether utilizing an activity tracker can enhance functional status in HFpEF patients. Methods: We performed a prospective analysis of 57 patients with HFpEF from 2021 to 2023 at a single academic medical center who utilized a Fitbit to record one year of daily step activity. The patients were evaluated in the ambulatory setting for an initial visit and subsequently at intervals of 3, 6, and 12 months to gather vitals, labs, physical exam, and functional measurements, including the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 (KCCQ-12). Associations between variables were assessed using Pearson's r correlation using Stata 18.0. Results: Of the 49 patients who completed the study, the mean age was 68.1 ± 10.2 years, with 67% of patients identifying as female. The average BMI was 36.4 ± 8.6 kg/m2. Across each time interval, the median numbers of steps per day were 4,113 (2,517-6,520) (1-3 months), 4,583 (2,532-6,326) (4-6 months), and 3,957 (2,942-5,982) (7-12 months). There was no statistically significant variation in daily step count (p=0.06). We observed a statistically significant increase of 66 (6-200) feet in the 6MWT (p= 0.002) from baseline (1,175 (910-1,400)) to 12 months (1,321 (1,000-1,550)). The daily step count was highly correlated with the 6MWT across all time points (1-3 months: r= .70, p< .001; 4-6 months: r= .61, p< .001; 7-12 months: r= .69, p< .001). The total KCCQ-12 scores increased by 6.8 (-4.2-19.8) points (p=0.005) from baseline (60.1 (41.7-73.4)) to 12 months (69.8 (50-84.4)). Among the sub-categories of the questionnaire, we observed a positive correlation between physical limitation scores and daily step count (1-3 months: r= .47, p=.001; 4-6 months: r= .63, p< .001; 7-12 months: r= .56, p= .001). Of interest, one patient who was taking over 15,000 daily steps scored their physical limitation 10-20 points lower than those taking less than half the steps and had one of the lowest quality of life scores in the cohort, reflecting the subjective nature of heart failure (HF) symptoms. Conclusion: Fitbit technology offers a convenient means to monitor real-time physical activity in patients with HFpEF. Utilizing a Fitbit to record daily step activity enhances health-related quality of life in this population. In contrast to the improved average total KCCQ-12 score, we did not observe a clinically significant increase in the 6MWT over the course of the year. Our findings establish the utility of daily step count as a valuable surrogate for six-minute walk distance.