Abstract:The UK Government is hosting COP26 in Glasgow between 31st October and 12th November 2021. It plans to make progress in four key areas which summarize as ‘coal, cars, cash and trees’ (Carbon Brief, 2021). The first two of these aims— to get agreement for the rapid phase out of coal, the most polluting of fossil fuels, and to ensure a rapid transition away for cars fuelled by fossil fuels— are very important, but are not directly related to the remit of Global Change Biology. The latter two aims— ensuring that the financial support of $100 billion per year promised in 2010 by wealthy countries to developing countries finally gets delivered and ensuring that climate solutions adopted also codeliver to nature— are squarely within the remit of Global Change Biology. With respect to the ‘cash’ aim, this flow of finance is essential to allow poorer countries to adapt to, and to mitigate, climate change. We know that a vast proportion of the potential for natural climate solutions is located in the developing world (Griscom et al., 2020), so if we are to realize that global potential, developing countries must have the financial backing to ensure that this happens in an equitable and just way. Not all of this cash will be used for naturebased solutions, of course, but a proportion of it will be, and naturebased solutions would almost certainly not happen at the scale and speed required to help us meet net zero greenhouse gas emissions targets without this cash. With respect to the ‘trees’ aim, the first thing to note is that naturebased solutions are about so much more than just planting trees (Seddon et al., 2021)! ‘Trees’ is just shorthand for naturebased solutions, but the broad variety of naturebased solutions available, beyond just tree planting, must be encouraged at COP26. The recent joint workshop report by IPBES and IPCC (Pörtner et al., 2021) demonstrated that we cannot successfully resolve either of the existential threats of climate change or biodiversity loss unless we tackle them both together. Mainstreaming nature into our thinking on climate action is essential, so encouraging all countries to include naturebased solutions in their nationally determined contributions to meet the goal of the Paris Agreement will be the first step in formalizing these considerations. But not all greenhouse gas removal options available on land or in the oceans constitute naturebased solutions— naturebased solutions must also provide benefits to human wellbeing and biodiversity— so the way in which they are implemented is crucial. Parties to the COP should be encouraged to adopt international guidelines for naturebased solutions, such as those provided by IUCN (2021), or those suggested by the NatureBased Solutions Initiative (NBSI, 2021), which are as follows: • Naturebased solutions are not a substitute for the rapid phaseout of fossil fuels and must not delay urgent action to decarbonize our economies. • Naturebased solutions involve the protection, restoration and/ or management of a wide range of natural and seminatural ecosystems on land and in the sea; the sustainable management of aquatic systems and working lands; or the creation of novel ecosystems in and around cities or across the wider landscape. • Naturebased solutions are designed, implemented, managed and monitored by or in partnership with Indigenous peoples and local communities through a process that fully respects and champions local rights and knowledge, and generates local benefits. • Naturebased solutions support or enhance biodiversity, that is, the diversity of life from the level of the gene to the level of the ecosystem.

UN biodiversity summit on reversing nature loss "veers dangerously off track"

Move past promises for biodiversity

Safeguarding our future by protecting biodiversity

Establishing a Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework

Success of 30 × 30 COP-16 Depends on Valuing Nature

Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines

Nature abhors a vacuum: invasive themes and other outputs from the tenth plenary of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES-10)

Actions to halt biodiversity loss generally benefit the climate

Enabling transformative economic change in the post‐2020 biodiversity agenda

The 2022 Stockholm+50 Moment in the Era of a Planetary Crisis: Some Lessons for the Scholars and the Decision-makers

Achieving global biodiversity goals by 2050 requires urgent and integrated actions

Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity

'A big, big win': plan to pay for wildlife conservation emerges at biodiversity summit

A need for Recalibration of the Discussions on Access and Benefit Sharing

Business-as-usual trends will largely miss 2030 global conservation targets

Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century

Essential Outcomes for COP26

The Policy Implications of the Dasgupta Review: Land Use Change and Biodiversity

Ensuring a Post-COVID Economic Agenda Tackles Global Biodiversity Loss

Synergies and trade-offs in achieving global biodiversity targets

The effectiveness of national biodiversity investments to protect the wealth of nature