Abstract:Infrastructure development is a major driver of biodiversity loss globally. With upward of US$2.5 trillion in annual investments in infrastructure, the financial sector indirectly drives this biodiversity loss. At the same time, biodiversity safeguards (project-level biodiversity impact mitigation requirements) of infrastructure financiers can help limit this damage. The coverage and harmonization of biodiversity safeguards are important factors in their effectiveness and therefore warrant scrutiny. It is equally important to examine the extent to which these safeguards align with best-practice principles for biodiversity impact mitigation outlined in international policies, such as that of the International Union for Conservation of Nature. We assessed the biodiversity safeguards of public development banks and development finance institutions for coverage, harmonization, and alignment with best practice. We used Institute of New Structural Economics and Agence Française de Développement's global database to identify development banks that invest in high-biodiversity-footprint infrastructure and have over US$500 million in assets. Of the 155 banks, 42% (n = 65) had biodiversity safeguards. Of the existing safeguards, 86% (56 of 65) were harmonized with International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance Standard 6 (PS6). The IFC PS6 (and by extension the 56 safeguard policies harmonized with it) had high alignment with international best practice in biodiversity impact mitigation, whereas the remaining 8 exhibited partial alignment, incorporating few principles that clarify the conditions for effective biodiversity offsetting. Given their dual role in setting benchmarks and leveraging private finance, infrastructure financiers in development finance need to adopt best-practice biodiversity safeguards if the tide of global biodiversity loss is to be stemmed. The IFC PS6, if strengthened, can act as a useful template for other financier safeguards. The high degree of harmonization among safeguards is promising, pointing to a potential for diffusion of practices.

The effectiveness of national biodiversity investments to protect the wealth of nature

Investing in the wealth of nature through biodiversity and ecosystem service finance solutions

Global assessment of the biodiversity safeguards of development banks that finance infrastructure

Investing in nature can improve equity and economic returns

The positive impact of conservation action

Safeguarding our future by protecting biodiversity

Do Investors Care about Biodiversity?

Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century

Indicators to monitor the status of the tree of life

Enabling transformative economic change in the post‐2020 biodiversity agenda

A bibliometric and systemic literature review of biodiversity finance

Increasing impacts of land use on biodiversity and carbon sequestration driven by population and economic growth

Biodiversity disclosure in the European finance sector

Mixed effectiveness of global protected areas in resisting habitat loss

Establishing a Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework

An investment strategy to address biodiversity loss from agricultural expansion

The benefits of protected areas for bird population trends may depend on their condition

Convention on Biological Diversity: a review of national challenges and opportunities for implementation

The Policy Implications of the Dasgupta Review: Land Use Change and Biodiversity

An Urgent Call to Integrate the Health Sector into the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework

Conserving tropical biodiversity via market forces and spatial targeting