Abstract:Eight conventions make up the biodiversity cluster of multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) that provide the critical international legal framework for the conservation and sustainable use of nature. However, concerns about the rate of implementation of the conventions at the national level have triggered discussions about the effectiveness of these MEAs in halting the loss of biodiversity. Two main concerns have emerged: lack of capacity and resources and lack of coherence in implementing multiple conventions. We focused on the latter and considered the mechanisms by which international conventions are translated into national policy. Specifically, we examined how the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and the associated Aichi Biodiversity Targets have functioned as a unifying grand plan for biodiversity conservation. This strategic plan has been used to coordinate and align targets to promote and enable more effective implementation across all biodiversity-related conventions. Results of a survey of 139 key stakeholders from 88 countries suggests streamlining across ministries and agencies, improved coordination mechanisms with all relevant stakeholders, and better knowledge sharing between conventions could improve cooperation among biodiversity-related conventions. The roadmap for improving synergies among conventions agreed to at the 13th Convention on Biological Diversity's Conference of Parties in 2016 includes actions such as mechanisms to avoid duplication in national reporting and monitoring on conventions and capacity building related to information and knowledge sharing. We suggest the scientific community can actively engage and contribute to the policy process by establishing a science-policy platform to address knowledge gaps; improving data gathering, reporting, and monitoring; developing indicators that adequately support implementation of national plans and strategies; and providing evidence-based recommendations to policy makers. The latter will be particularly important as 2020 approaches and work to develop a new biodiversity agenda for the next decade is beginning.

An Urgent Call to Integrate the Health Sector into the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework

Enabling transformative economic change in the post‐2020 biodiversity agenda

Transformational changes for achieving the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework ecological connectivity goals

Addressing the implementation challenge of the global biodiversity framework

Establishing a Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework

Scaling up area-based conservation to implement the Global Biodiversity Framework's 30x30 target: The role of Nature's Strongholds

Safeguarding our future by protecting biodiversity

Post-2020 biodiversity targets need to embrace climate change

Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century

Investing in the wealth of nature through biodiversity and ecosystem service finance solutions

Advancing Global Biodiversity Governance: Recommendations for Strengthening the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework

Achieving global biodiversity goals by 2050 requires urgent and integrated actions

Ensuring a Post-COVID Economic Agenda Tackles Global Biodiversity Loss

Governance principles for community‐centered conservation in the post‐2020 global biodiversity framework

Actions to halt biodiversity loss generally benefit the climate

Improving collaboration in the implementation of global biodiversity conventions

Health Synergies across International Sustainability and Development Agendas: Pathways to Strengthen National Action

A need for Recalibration of the Discussions on Access and Benefit Sharing

Progress in developing and operationalizing the Monitoring Framework of the Global Biodiversity Framework

Cities should respond to the biodiversity extinction crisis

Rapid evaluation of habitat connectivity change to safeguard multispecies persistence in human-transformed landscapes