Acute effects on cognitive performance following bouts of standing and light-intensity physical activity in a simulated workplace environment

Sarah L. Mullane,Matthew P. Buman,Zachary S. Zeigler,Noe C. Crespo,Glenn A. Gaesser
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2016.09.015
IF: 4.597
2017-05-01
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Abstract:OBJECTIVES: To compare acute cognitive effects following bouts of standing (STAND), cycling (CYCLE) and walking (WALK) to a sit-only (SIT) condition.DESIGN: Randomized cross-over full-factorial study.METHODS: Nine overweight (BMI=29±3kg/m<sup>2</sup>) adults (30±15years; 7 females, 2 males) completed four conditions (SIT, STAND, WALK and CYCLE) across a 6h period with a 7days washout period between conditions. SIT consisted of uninterrupted sitting. Experimental conditions included intermittent bouts of standing (STAND), cycling (CYCLE) and walking (WALK). A cognitive performance battery (Cogstate) was completed twice in a seated position following bouts of standing and light-intensity physical activity. Mixed-effects models compared between-condition differences in standardized score (z-score), accuracy (%), and speed (log10ms).RESULTS: Cognitive performance z-score and accuracy measures were higher during STAND, CYCLE and WALK (P&lt;0.05) conditions compared to the SIT condition. CYCLE was better than other experimental conditions.CONCLUSIONS: Compared to uninterrupted sitting, short bouts of standing or light-intensity cycling and walking may improve acute cognitive performance.
sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?