Layer-structured triple-conducting electrocatalyst for water-splitting in protonic ceramic electrolysis cells: Conductivities vs. activity

Wenyuan Li,Bo Guan,Tao Yang,Zhongqiu Li,Wangying Shi,Hanchen Tian,Liang Ma,Thomas L. Kalapos,Xingbo Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229764
IF: 9.2
2021-05-01
Journal of Power Sources
Abstract:<p>Electron, proton and oxygen-triple-conducting materials are becoming the dominant steam electrode candidate to break the rate limit on the water-splitting reaction that throttles the performance of protonic ceramic electrolysis cells (PCECs). In this study, based on Pr<sub>2</sub>NiO<sub>4+δ</sub> Ruddlesden-Popper phase, we manipulate these conductivities by Pr-site Ba substitution to probe the correlation of each conductivity with the kinetics of the elementary reaction steps. It is found that the proton conductivity is vital to sustain an extended active surface area for faster adsorption of reactants and desorption of products. The effect of oxygen conductivity is surprisingly found insignificant in the water-splitting reaction. On the contrary, surface oxygen removal is discovered as the most rate-limiting process. The electronic conductivity is not a direct limiting factor. However, an electron transfer process between the current collector and the electrode junction could introduce extra resistance that is perceptible at a high operating temperature range. The best water-splitting activity is obtained on a proton conductivity/oxygen surface desorption capability well-balanced sample after Ba substitution. As a result, a water-splitting reaction resistance of 0.022 Ωcm<sup>2</sup>, a current density of 1.96 A/cm<sup>2</sup> at 700 °C is achieved on Pr<sub>1.7</sub>Ba<sub>0.3</sub>NiO<sub>4+δ,</sub> one of the best performances for PCECs.</p>
energy & fuels,materials science, multidisciplinary,electrochemistry,chemistry, physical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?