The Appropriateness of Performing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

C. WINSLOW,J. KOSECOFF,M. CHASSIN,D. KANOUSE,R. BROOK

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00132586-198904000-00056

1989-04-01

Survey of Anesthesiology

Abstract:Comment The changes in therapy of coronary artery disease over the last decade (e.g., balloon angioplasty, thrombolytic therapy, etc.) make the conclusions of this study somewhat outdated. However, it demonstrates a reasonable methodology for future studies on the appropriateness of highly technical and expensive treatments. After compiling a exhaustive list of possible indications for the therapy, a reasonably broad panel of clinicians (both academic and private) was convened to assign an appropriateness score to each indication. Careful abstraction of patient records was then used to determine the indication for surgery for each patient and an appropriateness score for each patient assigned. However, the application of the methodology to this study leaves something to be desired. The panel was convened in 1984, asked to forget anything they had learned over the last 3 yr and judge the appropriateness of indications as if it were 1981. The appropriateness standards were then applied to operations performed during three different time periods (1979, 1980, and 1982). In an area such as coronary artery disease, where therapies and indications for surgery are changing yearly, this approach must cast doubt on the validity of the results. Having the panel develop the appropriateness scale based on current standards and examining operations performed during the same time period would seem to be a superior approach. Perhaps of more use to the medical community would be a re-examination of those operations that were judged inappropriate to determine what factors led to surgery being performed in spite of the apparent lack of indication. Charles W. Otto, M.D.

English Else