Impacts of wild herbivores on soil seed banks are explained by precipitation conditions in protected areas across semi‐arid to arid regions

Tongtong Xu,Will Cornwell,Ling Wang,Baptiste Wijas,Chen Liu,Zuoqiang Yuan,Mike Letnic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14803

IF: 6.865

2024-10-26

Journal of Applied Ecology

Abstract:Disruption of the soil seed banks by the grazing of wild herbivores could lead to the failure of post‐rain pulses of vegetation growth and hamper efforts to restore vegetation in protected areas. Therefore, suppressing wild herbivore numbers is a strategy that could enhance soil seed bank reserves and revegetation efforts in arid protected areas. Protected areas form the backbone of global conservation efforts. Vegetation is the primary foundation for achieving conservation goals, and soil seed banks is a cryptic biodiversity reservoir for recruiting species that may not be represented in above‐ground vegetation. Unfortunately, unmanaged grazing by wild herbivores has led to vegetation degradation in semi‐arid to arid regions. However, experimental evidence on the long‐term impacts of wild herbivores on soil seed banks is largely lacking. Here, with the aim of examining how wild herbivores impact soil seed banks, we investigated the composition of the germinable seed banks in three protected areas (Yathong, Mungo and Boolcoomatta) along a semi‐arid to arid precipitation gradient in south‐eastern Australia. The density and species richness of the soil seed banks increased with increasing aridity, which indicated that the soil seed banks in arid regions is an important biodiversity reservoir. The effects of wild herbivores on soil seed density were strongly dependent on precipitation. Wild herbivores disrupted the soil seed banks at the most arid site but promoted the accumulation of seeds in the soil at the least arid site. Grazing was linked to an increase in the frequency of the seeds of introduced species and decrease in the frequency of the seeds of perennials. Synthesis and applications: Disruption of the soil seed banks by the grazing of wild herbivores could lead to the failure of post‐rain pulses of vegetation growth and hamper efforts to restore vegetation in protected areas. Therefore, suppressing wild herbivore numbers is a strategy that could enhance soil seed bank reserves and revegetation efforts in arid protected areas. 中文摘要 自然保护区(protected areas)是全球生物保护的重要支柱。其中,植物是生物多样性和生态系统的核心组成部分,是实现生物保护目标的前提和基础。土壤种子库(soil seed banks)是一个隐蔽的植物多样性储备库,也是地上植被恢复的重要载体,对于维持植物多样性具有重要作用。尽管自然保护区限制了家畜和人为的干扰,但是野生食草动物(wild herbivores)的过度放牧造成了植被的退化和种子的丧失。然而,目前尚不清楚保护区内的野生食草动物对土壤种子库及植被恢复的长期作用和潜在影响。 考虑到降水是旱地保护区植被恢复的主要驱动力,本研究在澳大利亚东南部沿着半干旱到干旱的降水梯度,选择了三个自然保护区(Yathong,Mungo和Boolcoomatta),开展了超过10年的野生动物排除实验,以全面解析野生食草动物如何影响不同自然保护区的土壤种子库组成及植被恢复情况。 本研究发现降水和野生动物放牧均会影响保护区的土壤种子库。种子库的密度(seed density)和丰富度(seed richness)随降水量的减少而逐渐增加,表明土壤种子库确实是干旱区重要的植物多样性贮藏库。野生食草动物对土壤种子密度的影响强烈依赖于保护区的降水量,具体来说,野生食草动物导致最干旱保护区(Boolcoomatta)的土壤种子库密度降低,相反,促进了最湿润地区(Yathong)土壤种子的积累。此外,野生动物放牧与保护区内入侵物种的种子密度增加和多年生植物的种子密度减少有关。 启示与意义:野生食草动物放牧会破坏干旱地区的土壤种子库,导致降水对植被恢复的脉冲促进作用消失,阻碍保护区内的植被恢复。因此,需要加强对野生动物的管理,以增强干旱保护区内土壤种子库对植被恢复的促进作用。

biodiversity conservation,ecology