Dentine Remineralisation Induced by “Bioactive” Materials through Mineral Deposition: An In Vitro Study

Marta Kunert,Ireneusz Piwonski,Louis Hardan,Rim Bourgi,Salvatore Sauro,Francesco Inchingolo,Monika Lukomska-Szymanska
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14030274
IF: 5.3
2024-01-27
Nanomaterials
Abstract:This study aimed to assess the ability of modern resin-based “bioactive” materials (RBMs) to induce dentine remineralisation via mineral deposition and compare the results to those obtained with calcium silicate cements (CSMs). The following materials were employed for restoration of dentine cavities: CSMs: ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Sirona), MTA Angelus (Angelus), Biodentine (Septodont), and TheraCal LC (Bisco); RBMs: ACTIVA BioACTIVE Base/Liner (Pulpdent), ACTIVA Presto (Pulpdent), and Predicta Bioactive Bulk (Parkell). The evaluation of the mineral deposition was performed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) on the material and dentine surfaces, as well as at the dentine–material interface after immersion in simulated body fluid. Additionally, the Ca/P ratios were also calculated in all the tested groups. The specimens were analysed after setting (baseline) and at 24 h, 7, 14, and 28 days. ProRoot MTA, MTA Angelus, Biodentine, and TheraCal LC showed significant surface precipitation, which filled the gap between the material and the dentine. Conversely, the three RBMs showed only a slight ability to induce mineral precipitation, although none of them was able to remineralise the dentine–material interface. In conclusion, in terms of mineral precipitation, modern “bioactive” RBMs are not as effective as CSMs in inducing dentine remineralisation; these latter represent the only option to induce a possible reparative process at the dentin–material interface.
materials science, multidisciplinary,physics, applied,nanoscience & nanotechnology,chemistry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the difference in the effects of modern resin - based "bioactive" materials (RBMs) and calcium silicate cements (CSMs) in inducing dentin remineralization. Specifically, the research aims to evaluate the capabilities of these materials in dentin repair through mineral deposition and compare their effects. The materials used in the study include several calcium silicate cements (such as ProRoot MTA, MTA Angelus, Biodentine and TheraCal LC) and several resin - based bioactive materials (such as ACTIVA BioACTIVE Base/Liner, ACTIVA Presto and Predicta Bioactive Bulk). The material surfaces, dentin surfaces and dentin - material interfaces are analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy - dispersive X - ray spectroscopy (EDX) to evaluate the mineral deposition. In addition, the Ca/P ratios of all test groups are calculated. The main purpose of the study is to verify whether resin - based bioactive materials can promote dentin remineralization as effectively as calcium silicate cements. Specifically, the research hypothesis is that after being immersed in simulated body fluid (DPBS), the dentin remineralization ability of resin - based bioactive materials is similar to that of calcium silicate cements.