Abstract:In an experiment on the effects of different feedback conditions on motivationally relevant variables, Butler (1987) tested the hypothesis that the effects of feedback on intrinsic motivation would depend on whether that feedback promotes a task-involving or ego-involving orientation. She interpreted the findings as they relate to Nicholls's theory of task/ego involvement and our cognitive evaluation theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985). Although the data were very interesting, Butler failed to review a series of highly relevant studies, she misportrayed cognitive evaluation theory, and she drew conclusions that were not necessarily warranted given her experimental manipulations and data. This article provides a commentary on that research and presents a discussion of the relation between the two theories that Butler claimed to have tested. In a recent article, Butler (1987) attempted to "bridge the traditions" of research on task/ego involvement and intrinsic/ extrinsic motivation and to provide an apparent "critical test" between two current theories relevant to student motivation and performance, namely, Nicholls's (1979, 1984b) theory of ego versus task involvement and Deci and Ryan's (1980, 1985) cognitive evaluation theory. Unfortunately, the Butler article did not achieve either objective, being neither a new bridge nor an appropriate critical test. First, although unacknowledged in her article, the two areas of task/ego involvement and intrinsic/extrinsic motivation have been bridged for seven years by a series of empirical investigations and theoretical discussions. Second, her presentation has failed to provide a critical test of the theories, in part because she misrepresented cognitive evaluation theory. And third, her conclusions are subject to alternative interpretations given her specific experimental manipulations and results. In this comment, we will elaborate those three points and discuss the comparison of Nicholls's theory and ours.

The undermining effect is a reality after all—Extrinsic rewards, task interest, and self-determination: Reply to Eisenberger, Pierce, and Cameron (1999) and Lepper, Henderlong …

A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation.

Reinforcement, Reward, and Intrinsic Motivation: A Meta-Analysis

Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis.

Intrinsic motivation, external reward, and their effect on overall motivation and performance

Do People Embrace Praise Even When They Feel Unworthy? A Review of Critical Tests of Self-Enhancement Versus Self-Verification

Negative Relationships Between Self-Efficacy and Performance Can Be Adaptive: The Mediating Role of Resource Allocation

The Dark Side of Monetary Incentive

Determinants of intrinsic motivation: Locus of control and competence information as components of Deci's cognitive evaluation theory.

Bridging the Research Traditions of Task/Ego Involvement and Intrinsic/Extrinsic Motivation: Comment on Butler (1987)

Achievement Goals and Intrinsic Motivation: A Meta-Analytic Review

Student Motivation and Associated Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis From Self-Determination Theory

Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis.

Beyond intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis on self-determination theory’s multidimensional conceptualization of work motivation

The Self-Control Irony: Desire for Self-Control Limits Exertion of Self-Control in Demanding Settings

The role of causal attributions in determining behavioral consequences: A meta-analysis from an intrapersonal attributional perspective in achievement contexts.

Does effort increase or decrease reward valuation? Considerations from cognitive dissonance theory

When meta-analysis misleads: A critical case study of a meta-analysis of client feedback.

Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory