Neil P. Oxtoby,P. Warszawski,H. M. Wiseman,He-Bi Sun,R. E. S. Polkinghorne
Abstract: We present a new model for the continuous measurement of a coupled quantum dot charge qubit. We model the effects of a realistic measurement, namely adding noise to, and filtering, the current through the detector. This is achieved by embedding the detector in an equivalent circuit for measurement. Our aim is to describe the evolution of the qubit state conditioned on the macroscopic output of the external circuit. We achieve this by generalizing a recently developed quantum trajectory theory for realistic photodetectors [P. Warszawski, H. M. Wiseman and H. Mabuchi, Phys. Rev. A_65_ 023802 (2002)] to treat solid-state detectors. This yields stochastic equations whose (numerical) solutions are the ``realistic quantum trajectories'' of the conditioned qubit state. We derive our general theory in the context of a low transparency quantum point contact. Areas of application for our theory and its relation to previous work are discussed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: How to perform continuous measurement on solid - state charge qubits (charge qubit), and this measurement is carried out in consideration of the noise and filtering effects of actual measurement devices. Specifically, the authors propose a new model to describe the conditional probability distribution of the system state evolving over time when a low - transparency quantum point contact (Quantum Point Contact, QPC) measures the charge qubit of a coupled quantum dot (CQD).
### Core problems of the paper
1. **Influence of real - world measurement**:
- Most previous studies assumed idealized detectors and ignored the inevitable noise in actual measurement and the filtering effect in signal processing.
- The goal of this paper is to describe how the qubit state evolves according to the macroscopic output of the external circuit under actual measurement conditions, that is, how to connect microscopic events (such as electron tunneling) with macroscopic observation results.
2. **Conditional evolution**:
- Researchers focus on the conditional evolution of the quantum system given the actual measurement results. This not only helps to understand the dynamic behavior of the quantum system but also provides a theoretical basis for designing feedback control mechanisms.
- By introducing an equivalent circuit model, the authors simulate the influence of actual measurement devices on the qubit measurement process, especially the influence of noise and filtering on the measurement results.
### Solutions
- **Equivalent circuit model**: The authors construct an equivalent circuit to simulate the effects of actual measurement devices, including noise sources and filters.
- **Stochastic differential equations**: Stochastic differential equations (such as Itô calculus) are used to describe the conditional evolution of the qubit state, taking into account the noise and filtering effects introduced during the measurement process.
- **Quantum trajectory theory**: The quantum trajectory theory previously used for photon detectors is generalized to be applicable to solid - state detectors. By solving these stochastic equations, "real - world quantum trajectories" can be obtained, that is, the evolution path of the qubit state under actual measurement conditions.
### Formula summary
1. **Total Hamiltonian**:
\[
\hat{H}_{\text{qb}} = E_1 \hat{c}_1^\dagger \hat{c}_1 + E_2 \hat{c}_2^\dagger \hat{c}_2 + \frac{\Omega_0}{2} (\hat{c}_1^\dagger \hat{c}_2 + \hat{c}_2^\dagger \hat{c}_1)
\]
where \( \Omega_0 \) is the tunneling coefficient between the two quantum dots, and \( \hat{c}_1 \) and \( \hat{c}_2 \) are the Fermi annihilation operators of quantum dots 1 and 2 respectively.
2. **Master equation**:
\[
\frac{d\rho}{dt} = -i [\hat{H}_{\text{qb}}, \rho(t)] + D[T + X \hat{n}] \rho(t) \equiv L \rho
\]
where \( \hat{n} = \hat{c}_1^\dagger \hat{c}_1 \) represents the occupation number of the proximal quantum dot, \( D[\hat{X}] \rho = J[\hat{X}] \rho - A[\hat{X}] \rho \), \( J[\hat{X}] \rho = \hat{X} \rho \hat{X}^\dagger \), \( A[\hat{X}] \rho = \frac{1}{2} (\hat{X}^\dagger \hat{X} \rho + \rho \hat{X}^\dagger \hat{X}) \).
3. **Stochastic master equation**:
\[
d\rho_\mu(t) = dN(t) \left\{ J[T + X \hat{n}] \frac{E[dN(t)]}{dt} - 1 \right\} \rho_\mu(t) - dt H \