Long-term disease-free survival and health-related quality of life results of high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated in a community cancer center

Raphael William,Pierre-Yves McLaughlin,Mathieu Pharand-Charbonneau,Debbie Smith Wright,Alain Haddad,Marc Gaudet
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2024.10.004
IF: 2.441
2024-11-22
Brachytherapy
Abstract:PURPOSE To determine the long-term disease-free survival, long-term toxicity, and effect on health-related quality of life of a two-fraction regimen of high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated with CT-planned HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy in two implants of 13.5 Gy in one community cancer center. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaires were evaluated at each follow-up visit. Biochemical recurrence (Phoenix definition) was evaluated to determine disease-free survival at 5 and 7 years. Proportion of patients in each IPSS category (mild = 0–7, moderate = 8–18, severe = 19+) was evaluated at each follow-up interval. RESULTS Thirty patients were accrued to the study between 2014 and 2016. Median prostate-specific antigen was 8,7 (range 4.1–17.5). T stages were T1c = 65%, T2a = 21%, and T2b = 14%. Twenty-seven percent of patients had a Gleason score of 6 and 73% had a Gleason score of 7. 13% were in low risk category and 87% in intermediate risk category. Median follow-up was 84 months. There were no deaths at 84 months after brachytherapy. Disease-free survival was 90% at 5 years and 86% at 7 years. Two patients experienced late Grade 3 GU toxicity (6.6%). CONCLUSIONS This study serves as proof of concept that HDR monotherapy can be performed successfully with excellent long-term outcomes in a community cancer center with adequate training and experience. The long-term disease-free survival rate and the health-related quality of life seem acceptable as compared to other treatment modalities. Further study is ongoing with regard to the optimal dosing regimen for HDR monotherapy.
oncology,radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?