Impact of radiation source activity on short- and long-term outcomes of cervical carcinoma patients treated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy: A retrospective cohort study

Chenguang Li,Xiaofan Li,Jing You,Baosheng Liang,Xing Su,Yuliang Huang,Yi Chen,Qiaoqiao Hu,Jun Deng,Haiyang Wang,Yichen Pu,Hongjia Liu,Yanan Ma,Weihu Wang,Hao Wu,Yibao Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.037
IF: 5.304
2020-11-01
Gynecologic Oncology
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Objective</h3><p>High-dose-rate (HDR) afterloading brachytherapy using Iridium-192 source involves large radiation activity varieties due to fast decay. It was unknown but clinically desirable to evaluate its impacts on patient outcomes to support more informed decisions.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>Data of 510 cervical carcinoma (CC) patients were retrospectively included. High-radioactive (HR) and low-radioactive (LR) groups were statistically defined per patient-specific average mean-dose-rate (MDR) of all fractions. The cutoffs were calculated using R-3.6.1 packages based on significance of correlation with binary outcome or survival time. Categorized 1-month and 3-month follow-up results were analyzed as short-term outcomes. Long-term outcomes were evaluated using local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and metastatic recurrence-free survival (MRFS). Propensity-score-matched (PSM) pairs were generated to reduce bias.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>The median follow-up time was 47.1 months (interquartile range: 33.9 months–66.4 months), involving MDR varieties of up to 9 folds ranging from 6059.99 cGy/h to 54013.66 cGy/h due to 17 source replacements at intervals ranging from 93 days–199 days. Both short-term (1-month: <em>p</em> = 0.22; 3-month: <em>p</em> = 0.79) and long-term (LRFS: <em>p</em> = 0.10; MRFS: <em>p</em> = 0.46) outcomes showed no significant difference between HR and LR. Subgroup analysis displayed significantly better results in LR for stage I–II (3-month, <em>p</em> = 0.02) and stage II (LRFS, <em>p</em> = 0.04) patients. Both LRFS and MRFS of LR were significantly non-inferior to HR (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.02).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>LR is clinically non-inferior or partially superior to HR for CC treatment using HDR, which dispels concerns of potentially undermined patient outcomes when source replacement is delayed.</p>
oncology,obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?