Abstract:Fraud is a pervasive and challenging problem that costs society large amounts of money. By no means all fraud is committed by 'professional criminals': much is done by ordinary people who indulge in small-scale opportunistic deception. In this paper, we set out to investigate when people behave dishonestly, for example by committing fraud, in an online context. We conducted three studies to investigate how the rejection of one's efforts, operationalized in different ways, affected the amount of cheating and information falsification. Study 1 demonstrated that people behave more dishonestly when rejected. Studies 2 and 3 were conducted in order to disentangle the confounding factors of the nature of the rejection and the financial rewards that are usually associated with dishonest behavior. It was demonstrated that rejection in general, rather than the nature of a rejection, caused people to behave more dishonestly. When a rejection was based on subjective grounds, dishonest behavior increased with approximately 10%, but this difference was not statistically significant. We subsequently measured whether dishonesty was driven by the financial loss associated with rejection, or emotional factors such as a desire for revenge. We found that rejected participants were just as dishonest when their cheating did not led to financial gain. However, they felt stronger emotions when there was no money involved. This seems to suggest that upon rejection, emotional involvement, especially a reduction in happiness, drives dishonest behavior more strongly than a rational cost-benefit analysis. These results indicate that rejection causes people to behave more dishonestly, specifically in online settings. Firms wishing to deter customers and employees from committing fraud may therefore benefit from transparency and clear policy guidelines, discouraging people to submit claims that are likely to be rejected.

When are people more open to cheating? Economic inequality makes people expect more everyday unethical behavior

Diverging Effects of Clean Versus Dirty Money on Attitudes, Values, and Interpersonal Behavior.

Economic inequality breeds corrupt behaviour

When and why does economic inequality predict prosocial behaviour? Examining the role of interpersonal trust among different targets

Inequality shapes the propagation of unethical behaviours: Cheating responses to tax evasion along the income distribution

Economic inequality affects perceived normative values

Why do people always want more? Perceived economic inequality leads people to be greedy by enhancing relative deprivation

Economic inequality is linked to biased self-perception

High economic inequality is linked to greater moralization

Economic Inequality Perception Dampens Meritocratic Belief in China: The Mediating Role of Perceived Distributive Unfairness

Intrinsic honesty and the prevalence of rule violations across societies

How Social Class Shapes Attitudes on Economic Inequality: The Competing Forces of Self-Interest and Legitimation

Why Neoliberal Values of Self-Enhancement Lead to Cheating in Higher Education

How does economic inequality shape conspiracy theories? Empirical evidence from China

When Lying Feels the Right Thing to Do

System circumvention: Dishonest‐illegal transgressions are perceived as justified in non‐meritocratic societies

Economic Inequality and Unfairness Evaluations of Income Distribution Negatively Predict Political and Social Trust: Evidence From Latin America Over 23 Years

Invisible inequality leads to punishing the poor and rewarding the rich

Fairness views and cooperation under varying levels of economic inequality

How often do you cheat? Dispositional influences and intrapersonal stability of dishonest behavior

Feeling Entitled to More