Abstract:While enforcing egalitarian social norms is critical for human society, punishing social norm violators often incurs a cost to the self. This cost looms even larger when one can benefit from an unequal distribution of resources (i.e. advantageous inequity), as in receiving a higher salary than a colleague with the identical role. In the Ultimatum Game, a classic test bed for fairness norm enforcement, individuals rarely reject (punish) such unequal proposed divisions of resources because doing so entails a sacrifice of one's own benefit. Recent work has demonstrated that observing another's punitive responses to unfairness can efficiently alter the punitive preferences of an observer. It remains an open question, however, whether such contagion is powerful enough to impart advantageous inequity aversion to individuals. Using a variant of the Ultimatum Game in which participants are tasked with responding to fairness violations on behalf of another 'Teacher' - whose aversion to advantageous (versus disadvantageous) inequity was systematically manipulated-we probe whether individuals subsequently increase their punishment unfair after experiencing fairness violations on their own behalf. In two experiments, we found individuals can acquire aversion to advantageous inequity 'vicariously' through observing (and implementing) the Teacher's preferences. Computationally, these learning effects were best characterized by a model which learns the latent structure of the Teacher's preferences, rather than a simple Reinforcement Learning account. In summary, our study is the first to demonstrate that people can swiftly and readily acquire another's preferences for advantageous inequity, suggesting in turn that behavioral contagion may be one promising mechanism through which social norm enforcement - which people rarely implement in the case of advantageous inequality - can be enhanced.

Invisible inequality leads to punishing the poor and rewarding the rich

Selective insensitivity to income held by the richest

Rank Reversal Aversion Inhibits Redistribution Across Societies

Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences

Deliberately ignoring inequality to avoid rejecting unfair offers

Highlighting Opportunities (Versus Outcomes) Increases Support for Economic Redistribution

Absolute versus Relative Poverty and Wealth: Cooperation in the Presence of Between-Group Inequality

Fairness views and cooperation under varying levels of economic inequality

Fairness Beliefs Affect Perceived Economic Inequality

Punishing the privileged: Selfish offers from high-status allocators elicit greater punishment from third-party arbitrators

Inequality of Opportunity and Income Redistribution

Advantageous and disadvantageous inequality aversion can be taught through vicarious learning of others' preferences

Inequality shapes the propagation of unethical behaviours: Cheating responses to tax evasion along the income distribution

Fairness of inequality and support for redistribution: directly comparing citizens and legislators

Economic inequality breeds corrupt behaviour

Inequality aversion predicts support for public and private redistribution

Inequality, communication, and the avoidance of disastrous climate change in a public goods game

Equality, equity and incentives: An experiment

A false divide? Providing information about inequality aligns preferences for redistribution between right- and left-wing voters

When and why does economic inequality predict prosocial behaviour? Examining the role of interpersonal trust among different targets

Economic Inequality and Class Consciousness