Abstract:Objective. The previous meta-analysis has assessed that distal transradial access (dTRA) in anatomical snuffbox is safe and effective for coronary angiography and intervention and can reduce radial artery occlusion. However, since the publication of the previous meta-analysis, several observational studies have been added, so we performed an updated meta-analysis to include more eligible studies to compare distal transradial access in anatomical snuffbox with conventional transradial access (cTRA). Method. Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies from the literature published until 5 January 2021 to evaluate catheterization/puncture failure, hematoma, radial artery spasm, radial artery occlusion (RAO), access time, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose area product, total procedure time, and hemostatic device removal time. The pooled odds ratio (OR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. Results. A total of 9,054 patients from 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis, and we found no significant difference in catheterization/puncture failure (OR = 1.94, 95CI [0.97, 3.86], P = 0.06 ), hematoma (OR = 0.97, 95CI [0.55, 1.73], P = 0.926 ), radial artery spasm (OR = 0.76, 95CI [0.43, 1.36], P = 0.354 ), total procedure time (SMD = 0.23, 95CI [−0.21, 0.68], P = 0.308 ), or radiation dose area product (WMD = 216.88 Gy/cm2, 95CI [−126.24, 560.00], P = 0.215 ), but dTRA had a lower incidence of RAO (OR = 0.39, 95CI [0.23, 0.66], P < 0.001 ), shorter hemostatic device removal time (WMD = −66.62 min, 95CI [−76.68, −56.56], P < 0.001 ), longer access time (SMD = 0.32, 95CI [0.08, 0.56], P = 0.008 ), and longer fluoroscopy time (SMD = 0.16, 95CI [−0.00, 0.33], P = 0.05 ) than cTRA. Conclusion. Compared with the cTRA, the dTRA has a lower incidence of radial artery occlusion and shorter hemostatic device removal time, which is worthy of further evaluation in clinical practice.

Comparison of the feasibility and safety between distal transradial access and conventional transradial access in patients with acute chest pain: a single-center cohort study using propensity score matching

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transradial Access for Carotid Artery Stenting

Comparison of long-term radial artery occlusion via distal vs. conventional transradial access (CONDITION): a randomized controlled trial

Early prevention of radial artery occlusion via distal transradial access for primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Distal Transradial Access in Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach in Bypass Grafts.

Transradial Approach for Coronary Intervention in 92 Cases

Distal versus traditional radial access in patients undergoing emergency coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Transradial and Transfemoral Access for Retrograde Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Comparison of the Clinical Features and Prognostic Implications

Transradial Versus Transfemoral Method of Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison of Procedural and Late-Term Outcomes.

Comparison Between Distal Trans-radial Access and Conventional Trans-radial Access for Coronary Angiography

Abstract 317: Costs and Benefits Associated with Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in China

Comparison between transradial and transfemoral approaches for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Comparison of Clinical Value between Right Distal Radial Artery Access and Right Radial Artery Access in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Radial versus femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Trial sequential analysis

Radial Approach for Patients with ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: It is Definitely the Best Access Site.

PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION WITH A SMALL LUMINAL GUIDING CATHETER VIA RADIAL ARTERY FOR PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC TOTAL CORONARY OCCLUSION

A simple and easy technique to overcome anatomic challenges of transradial access in STEMI patients

The efficacy and safety of transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction

The beneficial effect of percutaneous coronary intervention via left transradial

Distal Versus Proximal Radial Arterial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Angiography and Intervention: Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials