Abstract:National and EU agricultural policies should adopt a landscape perspective by considering the amount of semi‐natural habitats when designing biodiversity‐enhancing measures that target field size and functional crop diversity. In landscapes with low SWF amount, decreasing field sizes may be particularly effective to promote farmland bird diversity and the abundance of non‐field breeders. In landscapes with a medium to high SWF amount, increasing functional crop diversity is likely more effective than reducing field sizes. Field and shrub breeders may be promoted by maintaining landscapes with large fields, only if these offer a high SWF amount, low agronomic yield potential and low productivity. Agricultural intensification has simplified landscape composition and configuration, which has led to biodiversity declines. Increasing landscape‐wide crop heterogeneity can promote farmland biodiversity. However, knowledge is still lacking on how the effects of configurational and compositional crop heterogeneity (i.e. field size and crop diversity) are modulated by the amount of semi‐natural habitats in the landscape, especially across large scales. We tested how mean field size and functional crop diversity affect farmland bird diversity and abundance over three consecutive years, and how these effects are modulated by the amount of small woody features (SWF) in the landscape. We related data from a national bird monitoring scheme to field‐level information from a novel, high‐resolution remote sensing‐based crop type map. Smaller field sizes and higher functional crop diversity were not generally associated with a higher diversity or abundance of farmland birds. Associations varied with species' breeding habitat preferences and were modulated by the amount of SWF. In landscapes with a low SWF amount, species diversity and the abundance of species breeding in field edges or shrubs were negatively associated with increasing field size. However, where the amount of SWF was high, larger field size was associated with higher species diversity and abundance of field and shrub breeders. Diversity increased with higher functional crop diversity, as did the abundance of non‐field breeders in landscapes with a medium to high SWF amount. Field size tended to have a stronger effect on bird diversity and abundance than functional crop diversity. Policy implications: National and EU agricultural policies should adopt a landscape perspective by considering the amount of semi‐natural habitats when designing biodiversity‐enhancing measures that target field size and functional crop diversity. In landscapes with low SWF amount, decreasing field sizes may be particularly effective to promote farmland bird diversity and the abundance of non‐field breeders. In landscapes with a medium to high SWF amount, increasing functional crop diversity is likely more effective than reducing field sizes. Field and shrub breeders may be promoted by maintaining landscapes with large fields, only if these offer a high SWF amount, low agronomic yield potential and low productivity. Zusammenfassung Die Intensivierung der Landwirtschaft hat zu einer Vereinheitlichung der Landschaftsstruktur und damit zu einem Rückgang der biologischen Vielfalt geführt. Eine höhere Vielfalt in der landwirtschaftlichen Flächennutzung auf Landschaftsebene kann die biologische Vielfalt in der Agrarlandschaft fördern. Noch wenig untersucht ist bisher jedoch, wie die Effekte von Konfiguration und Zusammensetzung der landwirtschaftlichen Flächennutzung (Feldgröße und Nutzpflanzenvielfalt) auf der Landschaftsebene mit dem Anteil naturnaher Lebensräume zusammenhängen. Wir haben untersucht, wie sich die durchschnittliche Feldgröße und die funktionale Vielfalt der Nutzpflanzen (Ackerkulturen und Grünland) auf die Diversität und Abundanz von Agrarvogelarten in drei aufeinanderfolgenden Jahren auswirken und wie diese Effekte durch den Anteil an Gehölzstrukturen (Hecken, Sträucher, Feldgehölze) in der Landschaft beeinflusst werden. Hierzu haben wir Daten aus dem bundesweiten Vogelmonitoring mit einer neuen, hochauflösenden, auf Fernerkundung basierenden Karte der landwirtschaftlichen Flächennutzung verknüpft. Unsere Ergebnisse zeigen, dass kleinere Feldgrößen und eine höhere funktionelle Vielfalt an Nutzpflanzen nicht generell mit einer höheren Vielfalt oder Abundanz von Agrarvögeln zusammenhingen. Vielmehr variierten die Zusammenhänge entsprechend der Bruthabitatpräferenzen der Arten und wurden durch den Anteil an Gehölzstrukturen in der Agrarlandschaft beeinflusst. In Landschaften mit einem geringen Anteil an Gehölzstrukturen war eine zunehmende Feldgröße mit einer geringeren Vielfalt und Häufigkeit von Vogelarten, die in Feldrändern oder Gebüschen brüten, verbunden. In Landschaften mit einem hohen Anteil an Gehölzstrukturen hing eine größere Feldgröße sowohl mit einer höheren Artenvielfalt als auch mit einer höhe -Abstract Truncated-

Temperate alley‐cropping agroforestry improves pest control potential by promoting spider abundance and functional diversity

The Effects of Vegetation Structure and Timber Harvesting on Ground Beetle (Col.: Carabidae) and Arachnid Communities (Arach.: Araneae, Opiliones) in Short-Rotation Coppices

Tree species identity, canopy structure and prey availability differentially affect canopy spider diversity and trophic composition

Pest control potential of adjacent agri‐environment schemes varies with crop type and is shaped by landscape context and within‐field position

New grasslands promote pollination but not biological pest control in nearby arable fields in the short term

Local management and landscape structure determine the assemblage patterns of spiders in vegetable fields

Arthropod Abundance and Community Structure in Adjacent Cotton and Alfalfa on the Texas High Plains

The Effect of Landscape Composition on the Abundance of Laodelphax Striatellus Fallén in Fragmented Agricultural Landscapes

Response of Spider and Epigaeic Beetle Assemblages to Overwinter Planting Regimes and Surrounding Landscape Compositions

Wild bee communities benefit from temporal complementarity of hedges and flower strips in apple orchards

Woody semi‐natural habitats modulate the effects of field size and functional crop diversity on farmland birds

Flower strip effectiveness for pollinating insects in agricultural landscapes depends on established contrast in habitat quality: A meta‐analysis

Plant-insect communities and predator-prey ratios in field margin strips, adjacent crop fields, and fallows

Riparian condition influences spider community structure and the contribution of aquatic carbon subsidies to terrestrial habitats

Tropical agroforestry supports insect pollinators and improves bean yield

Supportive effect of uncut refuge strips on grassland arthropods may depends on the amount and width of strips

Multifunctionality of temperate alley-cropping agroforestry outperforms open cropland and grassland

Sown understory vegetation strips impact soil chemical fertility, associated microorganisms and macro-invertebrates in two temperate alley cropping systems

Crop Diversity at the Landscape Level Affects the Composition and Structure of the Vegetation-Dwelling Arthropod Communities in Naked Oat (Avena Chinensis) Fields

Abundance, Diversity, and Function of Soil Microorganisms in Temperate Alley-Cropping Agroforestry Systems: A Review

Dwarf shrubs may mitigate the negative effects of climate change on spiders by moderating microclimate