Momelotinib vs. ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis patient subgroups by baseline hemoglobin levels in the SIMPLIFY-1 trial

Vikas Gupta,Stephen Oh,Timothy Devos,Viviane Dubruille,John Catalano,Tim C. P. Somervaille,Uwe Platzbecker,Pilar Giraldo,Hiroshi Kosugi,Tomasz Sacha,Jiri Mayer,Arpad Illes,Catherine Ellis,Zhaohui Wang,Francisco J. Gonzalez Carreras,Bryan Strouse,Ruben Mesa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2024.2328800
2024-03-21
Leukemia & Lymphoma
Abstract:A key hallmark of myelofibrosis is anemia, which ranges from mild to severe based on hemoglobin levels. To more clearly define outcomes with the Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2/activin A receptor type 1 inhibitor momelotinib by anemia severity, we performed a descriptive post hoc exploratory analysis of the double-blind, randomized, phase 3 SIMPLIFY-1 study (NCT01969838; N = 432, JAK inhibitor naive, momelotinib vs. ruxolitinib); subgroups were defined by baseline hemoglobin: <10 (moderate/severe), ≥10 to <12 (mild), or ≥12 g/dL (nonanemic). Spleen and symptom results were generally consistent with those previously reported for the intent-to-treat population. In anemic subgroups, momelotinib was associated with higher rates of transfusion independence and reduced/stable transfusion intensity vs. ruxolitinib. No new or unexpected safety signals were identified. Overall, momelotinib provides spleen, symptom, and anemia benefits to JAK inhibitor-naive patients with myelofibrosis regardless of baseline hemoglobin level, and greater anemia-related benefits vs. ruxolitinib in patients with hemoglobin <12 g/dL.
oncology,hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?