Abstract:The Reinforcer Pathology theoretical framework proposes alcohol use disorder (AUD) recovery is a dynamic process that depends on environmental factors and valuation of the future. This paper proposes that changing the environment in which substances are available, for example, by increasing non‐alcohol‐related activities, may extend one's temporal window thus valuing delayed larger rewards and be associated with improved recovery outcomes, including remission from AUD and greater quality of life. Recovery from alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a dynamic process that often entails periods of drinking but has been defined primarily by abstinence. Recently, a broader interpretation of recovery was developed, including meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) remission criteria and improved psychosocial functioning. This new understanding of recovery has facilitated the development of novel theories and methodologies. This paper reviews a new theoretical perspective of recovery, Reinforcer Pathology, and two novel methodological approaches in light of this broader view of recovery. Using this theoretical framework as a foundation, we propose an alternative perspective to explain the recovery process as it relates to environmental factors and valuation of the future; we suggest that changing the environment in which substances are available (e.g., increasing non‐alcohol‐related activities) and extending one's temporal window are associated with improved recovery outcomes (e.g., remission and quality of life). In this review, we discuss two novel methodological approaches. The first uses latent profile analysis to show that using a measure of Relative Reinforcement Value of Alcohol‐Free Activities is associated with a greater likelihood of belonging to a high functioning/infrequent heavy drinking recovery profile. The second developed an online national sample and used an accelerated longitudinal design to study longer‐term recovery of up to 12 years over a 5‐year study period. Reinforcer Pathology theory, novel methods, and measures may further our understanding of recovery and begin to address critical questions for future studies. Subsequent randomized clinical trials should examine whether the suggested targets and interventions based on the theoretical model improve recovery outcomes prospectively. Measuring and promoting alcohol‐free activity engagement may facilitate improved recovery outcomes, while novel methodologies permit an understanding of returning to use or remission across different recovery durations.

Issues in the definition and measurement of drinking outcomes in alcoholism treatment research.

Unitary versus multidimensional models of alcoholism treatment outcome: an empirical study.

Treatment effects across multiple dimensions of outcome.

Talk is cheap: measuring drinking outcomes in clinical trials.

Issues in the definition and diagnosis of alcoholism: implications for a reformulation.

Alcohol and drug use history, patterns and problems

The trouble with alcohol abuse: what are we trying to measure, diagnose, count and prevent?

Treatment for persons with substance use disorders: mediators, moderators, and the need for a new research approach

Outcomes of Treatment for Alcoholism: Current Data

Estimating measurement error in alcohol dependence symptomatology: Findings from a multisite study

Recovery from alcohol use disorder: Reinforcer pathology theory, measurement, and methods

Endpoints for Pharmacotherapy Trials for Alcohol Use Disorder

Integrated behavioral interventions for adults with alcohol use disorder: A systematic review

Psychological dimensions in alcohol use disorder: comparing active drinkers and abstinent patients

An International, Multidisciplinary Consensus Set of Patient-Centered Outcome Measures for Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders

Managing alcohol problems and risky drinking

Threshold and optimal cut-points for alcohol use disorders among patients in the emergency department.

The Dimensionality of Alcohol Use Disorders and Alcohol Consumption in A Cross-National Perspective

Effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for alcohol use disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis update

Constructs derived from the addiction cycle predict alcohol use disorder treatment outcomes and recovery 3 years following treatment.

Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: treatment main effects and matching effects on drinking during treatment. Project MATCH Research Group.