Abstract:Background and Aims: Alcohol consumption is an inherent feature of alcohol use disorder (AUD), and drinking characteristics may be diagnostically informative. This study had three aims: (1) to examine the classification accuracy of several drinking quantity/frequency indicators in a large representative sample of U.S. community adults; (2) to extend the findings to a clinical sample of adults; and (3) to examine potential sex differences. Design: In cross-sectional epidemiological and clinical datasets, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate diagnostic classification using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Measurements: Classifiers included measures of quantity/frequency (e.g., drinks/drinking day, largest drinks/drinking day, number of drinking days, and heavy drinking frequency). The clinical criterion (reference standard) was AUD diagnostic status per structured clinical interview (community sample) or a symptom checklist (clinical sample). Setting and Participants: Two samples were examined: a large, nationally representative random sample of U.S. community adults who reported past-year drinking (N=25,778, AUD=20%) and a clinical sample from a Canadian mental health and addictions inpatient treatment centre (N=1,341, AUD=82%). Findings: All drinking indicators performed much better than chance at classifying AUD (AUCs=0.60-0.92, ps<.0001). Heavy drinking frequency indicators performed optimally in both the community (AUCs=0.78-0.87; accuracy=0.72-0.80) and clinical (AUC=0.85-0.92; accuracy =0.77-0.89) samples. Collectively, the most discriminating drinking behaviors were number of heavy drinking episodes and exceeding drinking low-risk guidelines. No substantive sex differences in optimal cut-offs or variable performance were observed. Conclusions: Quantitative drinking indices performed well at classifying AUD in both a nationally representative and large inpatient sample, robustly identifying AUD at rates much better than chance and above accepted benchmarks, with limited differences by sex. These findings broadly support the potential clinical utility of quantitative drinking indicators, such as routine patient assessment via electronic medical records.

Talk is cheap: measuring drinking outcomes in clinical trials.

Issues in the definition and measurement of drinking outcomes in alcoholism treatment research.

Estimating measurement error in alcohol dependence symptomatology: Findings from a multisite study

“Never believe an alcoholic”? On the validity of self-report measures of alcohol dependence and related constructs

Using Alcohol Biosensors and Biomarkers to Measure Changes in Drinking: Associations Between Transdermal Alcohol Concentration, Phosphatidylethanol, and Self-Report in a Contingency Management Study of Persons with and Without HIV.

On the Value of Measuring Recent Drug Use by Self-Reports and Urinalysis in Clinical Trials

Early detection of harmful alcohol consumption: comparison of clinical, laboratory, and self-report screening procedures

Test-retest Reliability and Validity of Life-Course Alcohol Consumption Measures: the 2005 National Alcohol Survey Follow-Up.

Empirical correlates of self-report drinking measures.

Verbal report methods in clinical research on alcoholism: response bias and its minimization.

Monitoring of the Alcohol Biomarkers Peth, Cdt and Etg/Ets in an Outpatient Treatment Setting

A Cross-National Trial of Brief Interventions with Heavy Drinkers.

Self-Reported Substance Use With Clinician Interviewers Versus Self-Administered Surveys

Treatment effects across multiple dimensions of outcome.

Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: treatment main effects and matching effects on drinking during treatment. Project MATCH Research Group.

Just the facts: Enhancing measurement of alcohol consumption using self-report methods

Unitary versus multidimensional models of alcoholism treatment outcome: an empirical study.

Diagnostic Validity of Drinking Behaviour for Identifying Alcohol Use Disorder: Findings from a Nationally Representative Sample of Community Adults and an Inpatient Clinical Sample

Clinical and scientific implications of Project MATCH

Validating Self-Reported Unhealthy Alcohol Use with Phosphatidylethanol (peth) among Patients with HIV.

Longitudinal stability of reward and relief drinking phenotypes in community and treatment‐seeking individuals who engage in heavy drinking