Measurement properties of the Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS) validation studies: a systematic review protocol

Rouwida ElKhalil,Mohamad AlMekkawi,Matt O'Connor,Moustafa Sherif,Emad Masuadi,Luai A Ahmed,Rami H Al-Rifai,Messaouda Belfakir,Rasha Bayoumi,Iffat Elbarazi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081394
IF: 3.006
2024-04-04
BMJ Open
Abstract:Introduction Mental Health Literacy (MHL) is important for improving mental health and reducing inequities in treatment. The Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS) is a valid and reliable assessment tool for MHL. This systematic review will examine and compare the measurement properties of the MHLS in different languages, enabling academics, clinicians and policymakers to make informed judgements regarding its use in assessments. Methods and analysis The review will adhere to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Manual for Evidence Synthesis and will be presented following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis 2020 checklist. The review will be conducted in four stages, including an initial search confined to PubMed, a search of electronic scientific databases PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase (Elsevier), PubMed (NLM) and ERIC, an examination of the reference lists of all papers to locate relevant publications and finally contacting the MHLS original author to identify validation studies that the searches will not retrieve. These phases will assist us in locating studies that evaluate the measurement properties of MHLS across various populations, demographics and contexts. The search will focus on articles published in English between May 2015 and December 2023. The methodological quality of the studies will be evaluated using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist, and a comprehensive qualitative and quantitative data synthesis will be performed. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required. The publication will be in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023430924.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The issues this paper attempts to address are: 1. **Assessing the measurement properties of different language versions of the Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS)**: Through a systematic review of the literature, the paper aims to evaluate and compare the measurement properties of different language versions of the MHLS, so that academics, clinicians, and policymakers can better judge its application in assessments. 2. **Summarizing and comparing the processes of MHLS validation studies**: The paper will summarize the methods and processes used in different studies to validate the MHLS and assess the methodological quality of these studies. 3. **Providing new insights into the reliability and validity of the MHLS in cross-cultural contexts**: By conducting a comprehensive analysis of different language versions of the MHLS, the paper aims to provide new evidence for the validation of the MHLS in different cultural contexts. 4. **Guiding future research directions**: Through this systematic review, the research results can provide a theoretical framework for future MHLS validation studies and promote international cooperation and exchange in related fields.